FLCHvsGXCETF Comparison
VS
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. FLCH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.59% for GXC. FLCH is down -18.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$34M in YTD flows. GXC performs better with -17.18% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCH and GXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCH vs GXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCH GXC | -6.93%-7.45% | -11.84%-11.38% | -18.57%-17.18% | -23.09%-21.32% | +25.57%+24.37% | -20.03%-19.25% |
| Flows | FLCH GXC | -$33M- | -$14M+$5M | +$34M+$19M | +$82M+$43M | +$150M-$407M | +$176M-$619M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCH GXC | +14.68%+14.27% | +18.90%+18.08% | +23.10%+22.29% | +26.33%+24.67% |
| Max drawdown | FLCH GXC | -13.93%-13.98% | -23.91%-22.91% | -25.26%-23.35% | -48.70%-46.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCH GXC | 80d80d | 273d273d | 392d392d | 1395d1400d |
Trading data
FLCH | GXC | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.45 | $80.79 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $19.35 | $80.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCH | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCH | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.45 | $80.79 |
| 1D performance | +0.52% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $250.65 M | $420.87 M |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
FLCH | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | FTSE China RIC Capped Index | S&P China BMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 927 | 1233 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2017 | March 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
FLCH
China
91.51%
Other
8.49%
GXC
China
86.4%
Other
13.6%
Sectors
FLCH
Technology
25.43%
Finance
22.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.71%
Industrials
7.44%
Other
29.26%
GXC
Technology
23.62%
Finance
20.21%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.72%
Industrials
8.99%
Healthcare
7.63%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.28%
Other
18.55%
Diversification
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.62%
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.79%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.65%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.94%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.82%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.20%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.09%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.90%
Meituan
1.85%
NetEase, Inc.
1.54%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.48%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.35%
JD.com, Inc.
1.20%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
1.00%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
0.93%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
0.90%
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.68%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.67%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.59%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.20%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.82%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.73%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.59%
Meituan
1.48%
NetEase, Inc.
1.26%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.24%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.03%
JD.com, Inc.
0.98%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
0.96%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
0.78%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about FLCH and GXC
How have the FLCH and GXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, FLCH is down -18.57% year-to-date (YTD), while GXC has lost -17.18%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCH or GXC?
Year-to-date, the FLCH ETF saw +$34M in flows, compared to +$19M for GXC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCH or GXC?
Over the past year, FLCH had a volatility of 18.9%, while GXC experienced 18.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCH or GXC?
As of October 29, 2026, FLCH holds $250.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXC manages $420.87 M.
What sectors do the FLCH and GXC ETFs invest in?
FLCH leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, GXC focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the FLCH ETF and GXC ETF?
FLCH top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. GXC holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCH or GXC?
FLCH holds 1030 securities with 45.62% of its assets in the top 15. GXC has 1302 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLCH & GXC
Advertisement
