Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FLCGvsGGRWETF Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FLCG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GGRW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials. FLCG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.9% for GGRW. FLCG is down -4.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$110M in YTD flows. GGRW performs better with -2.91% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCG and GGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FLCG vs GGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCG GGRW | -0.87%-0.83% | -5.80%-4.12% | -4.88%-2.91% | +21.44%+22.26% | n/a+120.91% | n/a+51.26% |
| Flows | FLCG GGRW | +$32M- | +$131M- | +$110M- | +$389M+$1M | -+$2M | -+$3M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCG GGRW | +15.27%+15.02% | +22.71%+19.69% | n/a+19.05% | n/a+25.53% |
| Max drawdown | FLCG GGRW | -7.54%-6.30% | -16.47%-13.07% | n/a-20.31% | n/a-50.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCG GGRW | 73d58d | 45d37d | n/a151d | n/a1057d |
FLCG | GGRW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:09 PM | $30.75 | $33.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $30.93 | $33.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FLCG | GGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.75 | $33.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | +0.35% |
| AuM | $434.27 M | $7.87 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.9% |
FLCG | GGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Gabelli Funds |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 88 | 37 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | February 16, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FLCG and GGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FLCG is down -4.88% year-to-date (YTD), while GGRW has lost -2.91%. That puts GGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCG or GGRW?
Year-to-date, the FLCG ETF saw +$110M in flows, compared to - for GGRW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCG or GGRW?
Over the past year, FLCG had a volatility of 22.71%, while GGRW experienced 19.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCG or GGRW?
As of March 11, 2026, FLCG holds $434.27 M in assets under management (AUM), while GGRW manages $7.87 M.
What sectors do the FLCG and GGRW ETFs invest in?
FLCG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GGRW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FLCG ETF and GGRW ETF?
FLCG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GGRW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCG or GGRW?
FLCG holds 90 securities with 67.24% of its assets in the top 15. GGRW has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.37%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
