FLCEvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FLCE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.86%, versus 0.15% for IWB. FLCE is up 10.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 11.94% YTD performance, and -$2.46B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCE and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCE vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCE IWB | -1.22%-2.19% | +3.51%+1.12% | +10.83%+11.94% | +14.76%+15.73% | n/a+74.05% | n/a+77.33% |
| Flows | FLCE IWB | +$13K-$63M | +$11K-$360M | +$17M-$2.46B | +$18M-$2.02B | --$2.68B | --$2.45B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCE IWB | +10.68%+11.53% | +12.06%+13.03% | n/a+15.24% | n/a+17.35% |
| Max drawdown | FLCE IWB | -2.80%-3.34% | -8.93%-8.86% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCE IWB | 16d19d | 92d76d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
Trading data
FLCE | IWB | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.57 | $416.05 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $31.70 | $417.91 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLCE | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCE | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.57 | $416.05 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $81.74 M | $48.81 B |
| E/R | 0.86% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
FLCE | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Frontier Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 753 | 1011 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLCE
USA
95.07%
Other
4.93%
IWB
USA
97.59%
Other
2.41%
Sectors
FLCE
Technology
39.84%
Finance
14.54%
Healthcare
12.29%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.21%
Industrials
7.89%
Other
16.23%
IWB
Technology
42.37%
Finance
14.69%
Healthcare
9.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.65%
Industrials
8.55%
Other
16.51%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLCE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.6%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FLCE
Apple, Inc.
5.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.31%
Microsoft Corp.
4.66%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.48%
Broadcom Inc.
3.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.99%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.63%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.48%
Johnson & Johnson
1.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.33%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.19%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.11%
Visa, Inc.
1.07%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.04%
IWB
Apple, Inc.
7.01%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.62%
Microsoft Corp.
4.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.83%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.43%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.36%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.34%
Tesla, Inc.
1.31%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.15%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about FLCE and IWB
How have the FLCE and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, FLCE is up 10.83% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 11.94%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCE or IWB?
Year-to-date, the FLCE ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$2.46B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCE or IWB?
Over the past year, FLCE had a volatility of 12.06%, while IWB experienced 13.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCE or IWB?
As of September 11, 2026, FLCE holds $81.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.81 B.
What sectors do the FLCE and IWB ETFs invest in?
FLCE leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLCE ETF and IWB ETF?
FLCE top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCE or IWB?
FLCE holds 757 securities with 37.6% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLCE & IWB
Frontier Asset Management Unveils a Suite of Actively Managed "Fund-of-Funds" ETFs
December 27, 2024
FLCE
Advertisement
Advertisement
