FLCEvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Frontier Asset U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (FLCE) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FLCE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.86%, versus 0.15% for IWB. FLCE is up 8.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 9.16% YTD performance, and -$2.08B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCE and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCE vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCE IWB | -0.90%-0.97% | +3.67%+3.52% | +8.24%+9.16% | +16.01%+17.62% | n/a+66.71% | n/a+74.86% |
| Flows | FLCE IWB | -$307K+$225M | +$6M+$224M | +$17M-$2.08B | +$17M-$1.28B | --$2.68B | --$2.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCE IWB | +12.23%+13.38% | +12.10%+13.01% | n/a+15.26% | n/a+17.31% |
| Max drawdown | FLCE IWB | -3.71%-4.33% | -8.93%-8.86% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCE IWB | 31d58d | 92d76d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
Trading data
FLCE | IWB | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.93 | $405.80 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $30.49 | $399.27 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLCE | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCE | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.93 | $405.80 |
| 1D performance | +1.43% | +1.64% |
| AuM | $79.82 M | $47.96 B |
| E/R | 0.86% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
FLCE | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Frontier Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 744 | 1006 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLCE
USA
94.93%
Other
5.07%
IWB
USA
97.26%
Other
2.74%
Sectors
FLCE
Technology
40.59%
Finance
13.85%
Healthcare
12.07%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.76%
Industrials
8.47%
Other
16.27%
IWB
Technology
43.33%
Finance
13.78%
Healthcare
8.9%
Industrials
8.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.46%
Other
16.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLCE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.43%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
FLCE
NVIDIA Corp.
5.37%
Apple, Inc.
4.99%
Microsoft Corp.
3.77%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.12%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.02%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.05%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.62%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.59%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.34%
Johnson & Johnson
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.24%
Lam Research Corp.
1.20%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.07%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
6.72%
Apple, Inc.
6.03%
Microsoft Corp.
3.99%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Broadcom Inc.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.87%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.78%
Tesla, Inc.
1.77%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.38%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.36%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Intel Corp.
0.88%
Frequently asked questions about FLCE and IWB
How have the FLCE and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, FLCE is up 8.24% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 9.16%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCE or IWB?
Year-to-date, the FLCE ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$2.08B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCE or IWB?
Over the past year, FLCE had a volatility of 12.1%, while IWB experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCE or IWB?
As of July 30, 2026, FLCE holds $79.82 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $47.96 B.
What sectors do the FLCE and IWB ETFs invest in?
FLCE leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLCE ETF and IWB ETF?
FLCE top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCE or IWB?
FLCE holds 756 securities with 36.43% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FLCE & IWB
Frontier Asset Management Unveils a Suite of Actively Managed "Fund-of-Funds" ETFs
December 27, 2024
FLCE
Advertisement
Advertisement
