Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FLCCvsRECSETF Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FLCC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. FLCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.15% for RECS. FLCC is down -1.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. RECS performs better with -1.84% YTD performance, and +$282M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCC and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FLCC vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCC RECS | -1.41%-2.94% | -3.06%-2.73% | -1.98%-1.84% | +19.63%+22.98% | n/a+82.47% | n/a+95.09% |
| Flows | FLCC RECS | -$11M+$174M | +$3M+$487M | +$3M+$282M | +$29M+$2.28B | -+$4.23B | -+$4.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCC RECS | +12.44%+11.63% | +19.40%+17.97% | n/a+14.48% | n/a+16.55% |
| Max drawdown | FLCC RECS | -4.07%-3.61% | -14.97%-13.84% | n/a-18.49% | n/a-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCC RECS | 64d30d | 45d45d | n/a126d | n/a573d |
FLCC | RECS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.32 | $39.21 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $31.82 | $39.47 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FLCC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FLCC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.32 | $39.21 |
| 1D performance | -1.56% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $50.15 M | $4.95 B |
| E/R | 0.44% | 0.15% |
FLCC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 331 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FLCC and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FLCC is down -1.98% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.84%. That puts RECS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCC or RECS?
Year-to-date, the FLCC ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$282M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCC or RECS?
Over the past year, FLCC had a volatility of 19.4%, while RECS experienced 17.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCC or RECS?
As of March 11, 2026, FLCC holds $50.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.95 B.
What sectors do the FLCC and RECS ETFs invest in?
FLCC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FLCC ETF and RECS ETF?
FLCC top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, MICROSOFT-T and NVIDIA. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCC or RECS?
FLCC holds 142 securities with 43.44% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.