FLCCvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. FLCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.15% for IWB. FLCC is up 12.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$115M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with 11.99% YTD performance, and -$2.80B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCC and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FLCC vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCC IWB | -0.63%-0.95% | +2.58%+3.06% | +12.43%+11.99% | +15.48%+13.75% | n/a+86.19% | n/a+72.08% |
| Flows | FLCC IWB | +$23M-$104M | +$61M-$660M | +$115M-$2.80B | +$107M-$1.04B | --$2.93B | --$2.80B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCC IWB | +11.07%+11.14% | +12.87%+12.89% | n/a+15.13% | n/a+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | FLCC IWB | -3.87%-3.22% | -9.24%-8.86% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCC IWB | 70d53d | 98d76d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
Trading data
FLCC | IWB | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.40 | $415.35 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $36.53 | $417.25 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FLCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFLCC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FLCC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.40 | $415.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $178.04 M | $48.38 B |
| E/R | 0.44% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
FLCC | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 151 | 1007 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FLCC
USA
96.48%
Other
3.52%
IWB
USA
97.62%
Other
2.38%
Sectors
FLCC
Technology
43.93%
Finance
14.53%
Healthcare
10.04%
Industrials
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.09%
Other
14.07%
IWB
Technology
42.97%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.59%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
16.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
FLCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.1%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FLCC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.79%
Apple, Inc.
6.65%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.24%
Microsoft Corp.
4.55%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.17%
Fiserv, Inc.
2.15%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.13%
Broadcom Inc.
2.03%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.96%
GE Aerospace
1.95%
State Street Corp.
1.90%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.75%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
1.68%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.66%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.50%
IWB
NVIDIA Corp.
7.26%
Apple, Inc.
6.45%
Microsoft Corp.
5.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Broadcom Inc.
2.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.25%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.52%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.34%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.32%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.08%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about FLCC and IWB
How have the FLCC and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, FLCC is up 12.43% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 11.99%. That puts FLCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCC or IWB?
Year-to-date, the FLCC ETF saw +$115M in flows, compared to -$2.80B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCC or IWB?
Over the past year, FLCC had a volatility of 12.87%, while IWB experienced 12.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCC or IWB?
As of October 22, 2026, FLCC holds $178.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.38 B.
What sectors do the FLCC and IWB ETFs invest in?
FLCC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FLCC ETF and IWB ETF?
FLCC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCC or IWB?
FLCC holds 151 securities with 47.1% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1018 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.83%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
