Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FLCCvsGSLCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FLCC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, GSLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. FLCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.09% for GSLC. FLCC is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. GSLC performs better with -1.64% YTD performance, and -$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FLCC and GSLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FLCC vs GSLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLCC GSLC | -1.80%-2.50% | -2.85%-2.11% | -2.02%-1.64% | +18.75%+19.29% | n/a+75.76% | n/a+79.19% |
| Flows | FLCC GSLC | -$9M+$33M | +$3M-$214M | +$3M-$289M | +$29M-$242M | --$2.25B | --$3.72B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FLCC GSLC | +12.46%+11.53% | +19.42%+18.03% | n/a+14.62% | n/a+16.64% |
| Max drawdown | FLCC GSLC | -4.07%-3.81% | -14.97%-13.56% | n/a-18.65% | n/a-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | FLCC GSLC | 63d57d | 45d45d | n/a126d | n/a713d |
FLCC | GSLC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:00 PM | $31.52 | $128.38 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $31.82 | $129.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FLCC | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FLCC | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.52 | $128.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.93% | -1.19% |
| AuM | $50.13 M | $14.48 B |
| E/R | 0.44% | 0.09% |
FLCC | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 405 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 31, 2024 | September 17, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FLCC and GSLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FLCC is down -2.02% year-to-date (YTD), while GSLC has lost -1.64%. That puts GSLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FLCC or GSLC?
Year-to-date, the FLCC ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$289M for GSLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FLCC or GSLC?
Over the past year, FLCC had a volatility of 19.42%, while GSLC experienced 18.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: FLCC or GSLC?
As of March 10, 2026, FLCC holds $50.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSLC manages $14.48 B.
What sectors do the FLCC and GSLC ETFs invest in?
FLCC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSLC focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the FLCC ETF and GSLC ETF?
FLCC top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, MICROSOFT-T and NVIDIA. GSLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FLCC or GSLC?
FLCC holds 142 securities with 43.44% of its assets in the top 15. GSLC has 432 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.3%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
