Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FHLCvsPJPETF Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) belong to the same industry segment: US Health Care. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. FHLC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.57% for PJP. FHLC is down -1.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$111M in YTD flows. PJP performs better with 0.96% YTD performance, and +$89M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FHLC and PJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FHLC vs PJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHLC PJP | -1.39%-3.66% | +0.15%+0.35% | -1.48%+0.96% | +7.42%+25.49% | +29.92%+46.89% | +35.91%+39.70% |
| Flows | FHLC PJP | +$34M+$6M | +$130M+$93M | +$111M+$89M | -$10M+$91M | -$619M+$6M | -$230M-$49M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FHLC PJP | +13.18%+14.70% | +17.31%+18.60% | +13.68%+15.30% | +14.81%+15.87% |
| Max drawdown | FHLC PJP | -5.00%-5.17% | -11.86%-13.71% | -16.88%-16.11% | -17.78%-17.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | FHLC PJP | 62d31d | 190d130d | 435d275d | 762d788d |
FHLC | PJP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $102.80 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $73.01 | $105.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FHLC | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FHLC | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $102.80 |
| 1D performance | -1.93% | -2.52% |
| AuM | $2.91 B | $406.31 M |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.57% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FHLC and PJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FHLC is down -1.48% year-to-date (YTD), while PJP has returned 0.96%. That puts PJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FHLC or PJP?
Year-to-date, the FHLC ETF saw +$111M in flows, compared to +$89M for PJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FHLC or PJP?
Over the past year, FHLC had a volatility of 17.31%, while PJP experienced 18.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: FHLC or PJP?
As of March 10, 2026, FHLC holds $2.91 B in assets under management (AUM), while PJP manages $406.31 M.
What sectors do the FHLC and PJP ETFs invest in?
FHLC leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, PJP focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FHLC ETF and PJP ETF?
FHLC top holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE. PJP holds in its top three: GILEAD SCIENCES, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and MERCK & CO INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHLC or PJP?
FHLC holds 328 securities with 59.98% of its assets in the top 15. PJP has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
