Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FHLCvsBBHETF Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) belong to the same industry segment: US Health Care. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. FHLC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.35% for BBH. FHLC is down -1.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$111M in YTD flows. BBH performs better with 1.49% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FHLC and BBH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FHLC vs BBH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHLC BBH | -1.39%-1.90% | +0.15%+0.58% | -1.48%+1.49% | +7.42%+19.17% | +29.92%+25.33% | +35.91%+12.69% |
| Flows | FHLC BBH | +$34M-$2M | +$130M-$2M | +$111M-$2M | -$10M-$58M | -$619M-$190M | -$230M-$121M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FHLC BBH | +13.18%+19.85% | +17.31%+22.37% | +13.68%+18.42% | +14.81%+21.47% |
| Max drawdown | FHLC BBH | -5.00%-6.07% | -11.86%-14.98% | -16.88%-22.78% | -17.78%-39.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | FHLC BBH | 62d43d | 190d128d | 435d440d | 762d1675d |
FHLC | BBH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $188.44 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $73.01 | $192.04 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FHLC | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FHLC | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $188.44 |
| 1D performance | -1.93% | -1.87% |
| AuM | $2.91 B | $379.50 M |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FHLC and BBH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FHLC is down -1.48% year-to-date (YTD), while BBH has returned 1.49%. That puts BBH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FHLC or BBH?
Year-to-date, the FHLC ETF saw +$111M in flows, compared to -$2M for BBH.
Which ETF is more volatile: FHLC or BBH?
Over the past year, FHLC had a volatility of 17.31%, while BBH experienced 22.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: FHLC or BBH?
As of March 10, 2026, FHLC holds $2.91 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBH manages $379.50 M.
What sectors do the FHLC and BBH ETFs invest in?
FHLC leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, BBH focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FHLC ETF and BBH ETF?
FHLC top holdings include LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE. BBH holds in its top three: GILEAD SCIENCES, AMGEN-T and VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FHLC or BBH?
FHLC holds 328 securities with 59.98% of its assets in the top 15. BBH has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.43%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
