FFGXvsDBAWETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.51%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. FFGX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. FFGX is up 12.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. DBAW performs better with 15.28% YTD performance, and +$69M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFGX and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FFGX vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFGX DBAW | -3.75%-2.76% | -2.31%-1.35% | +12.05%+15.28% | +15.65%+23.57% | n/a+70.60% | n/a+76.99% |
| Flows | FFGX DBAW | -+$19M | +$10M+$60M | +$20M+$69M | +$20M+$81M | -+$100M | -+$118M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFGX DBAW | +16.59%+11.73% | +16.33%+12.14% | n/a+11.28% | n/a+11.39% |
| Max drawdown | FFGX DBAW | -7.85%-4.64% | -12.03%-8.71% | n/a-13.33% | n/a-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | FFGX DBAW | 85d85d | 68d65d | n/a84d | n/a576d |
Trading data
FFGX | DBAW | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.80 | $47.52 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $33.91 | $47.46 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFGX
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFFGX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FFGX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.80 | $47.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $54.15 M | $324.16 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
FFGX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 170 | 2004 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 19, 2024 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FFGX
United Kingdom
12.6%
Japan
11.9%
Taiwan
10.02%
China
7.84%
France
7.07%
Other
50.56%
DBAW
Japan
13.32%
United Kingdom
8.24%
Canada
8.15%
Taiwan
8.15%
Other
62.14%
Sectors
FFGX
Finance
26.24%
Technology
23.79%
Industrials
17.78%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.46%
Other
22.74%
DBAW
Finance
27.23%
Technology
20.52%
Industrials
11.63%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.04%
Other
33.58%
Advertisement
Diversification
FFGX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.75%
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.13%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FFGX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
7.52%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.14%
ASML Holding NV
2.76%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.95%
Banco Santander SA
1.74%
CaixaBank SA
1.72%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.67%
Schneider Electric SE
1.57%
Safran SA
1.49%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
1.47%
Investor AB
1.41%
UniCredit SpA
1.40%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.32%
Air Liquide SA
1.30%
DBAW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.66%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.90%
ASML Holding NV
1.66%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.58%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.96%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.95%
Roche Holding AG
0.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.81%
Novartis AG
0.78%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.70%
Nestlé SA
0.70%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.65%
Shell Plc
0.65%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.64%
Siemens AG
0.62%
Frequently asked questions about FFGX and DBAW
How have the FFGX and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, FFGX is up 12.05% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 15.28%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FFGX or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the FFGX ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to +$69M for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FFGX or DBAW?
Over the past year, FFGX had a volatility of 16.33%, while DBAW experienced 12.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: FFGX or DBAW?
As of September 15, 2026, FFGX holds $54.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $324.16 M.
What sectors do the FFGX and DBAW ETFs invest in?
FFGX leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FFGX ETF and DBAW ETF?
FFGX top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV. DBAW holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: FFGX or DBAW?
FFGX holds 171 securities with 32.75% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 2083 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.13%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
