FFGXvsACWXETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. FFGX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. FFGX is up 12.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. ACWX performs better with 15.1% YTD performance, and +$3.15B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FFGX and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FFGX vs ACWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FFGX ACWX | -3.02%-1.93% | -1.83%-0.47% | +12.60%+15.10% | +16.22%+21.05% | n/a+69.96% | n/a+52.88% |
| Flows | FFGX ACWX | -+$575M | +$10M+$789M | +$20M+$3.15B | +$20M+$3.93B | -+$4.80B | -+$5.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FFGX ACWX | +16.70%+15.89% | +16.36%+16.74% | n/a+14.81% | n/a+15.80% |
| Max drawdown | FFGX ACWX | -7.85%-5.31% | -12.03%-11.33% | n/a-13.37% | n/a-29.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | FFGX ACWX | 84d50d | 68d69d | n/a43d | n/a906d |
Trading data
FFGX | ACWX | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.91 | $75.93 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $34.03 | $76.27 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFGX
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFFGX | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FFGX | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.91 | $75.93 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $54.42 M | $12.31 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.32% |
Exposure
Countries
FFGX
United Kingdom
12.6%
Japan
11.9%
Taiwan
10.02%
China
7.84%
France
7.07%
Other
50.56%
ACWX
Japan
13.86%
United Kingdom
8.46%
Canada
8.29%
Taiwan
8.02%
Other
61.37%
Sectors
FFGX
Finance
26.24%
Technology
23.79%
Industrials
17.78%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.46%
Other
22.74%
ACWX
Finance
27.98%
Technology
20.51%
Industrials
12.14%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.31%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.28%
Other
24.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
FFGX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.75%
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FFGX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
7.52%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.14%
ASML Holding NV
2.76%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.95%
Banco Santander SA
1.74%
CaixaBank SA
1.72%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.67%
Schneider Electric SE
1.57%
Safran SA
1.49%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
1.47%
Investor AB
1.41%
UniCredit SpA
1.40%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.32%
Air Liquide SA
1.30%
ACWX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.61%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.85%
ASML Holding NV
1.77%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.40%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.02%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.00%
Roche Holding AG
0.84%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.81%
Novartis AG
0.79%
Nestlé SA
0.72%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.71%
Shell Plc
0.69%
Siemens AG
0.66%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.66%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.65%
Frequently asked questions about FFGX and ACWX
How have the FFGX and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, FFGX is up 12.6% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 15.1%. That puts ACWX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FFGX or ACWX?
Year-to-date, the FFGX ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to +$3.15B for ACWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: FFGX or ACWX?
Over the past year, FFGX had a volatility of 16.36%, while ACWX experienced 16.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: FFGX or ACWX?
As of September 14, 2026, FFGX holds $54.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $12.31 B.
What sectors do the FFGX and ACWX ETFs invest in?
FFGX leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the FFGX ETF and ACWX ETF?
FFGX top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV. ACWX holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: FFGX or ACWX?
FFGX holds 171 securities with 32.75% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1853 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.18%.
Advertisement
