Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FEXvsGSEWETF Comparison
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FEX) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FEX's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, GSEW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. FEX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.09% for GSEW. FEX is up 2.46% year-to-date (YTD) with -$18M in YTD flows. GSEW performs worse with 1.97% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEX and GSEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FEX vs GSEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEX GSEW | -3.48%-2.47% | +1.99%+0.37% | +2.46%+1.97% | +22.20%+16.99% | +63.08%+58.43% | +61.08%+52.21% |
| Flows | FEX GSEW | +$90K+$45M | -$18M+$118M | -$18M+$71M | -$76M+$299M | -$243M+$812M | -$212M+$716M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEX GSEW | +12.05%+12.44% | +17.93%+17.69% | +14.96%+14.48% | +16.84%+16.96% |
| Max drawdown | FEX GSEW | -4.90%-3.47% | -13.48%-13.46% | -19.51%-18.23% | -21.53%-25.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | FEX GSEW | 18d13d | 46d46d | 232d211d | 757d834d |
FEX | GSEW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.30 | $85.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $121.44 | $85.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FEX | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FEX | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.30 | $85.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $1.39 B | $1.60 B |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.09% |
FEX | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Core Index | Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 356 | 469 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | December 9, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FEX and GSEW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FEX is up 2.46% year-to-date (YTD), while GSEW has returned 1.97%. That puts FEX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEX or GSEW?
Year-to-date, the FEX ETF saw -$18M in flows, compared to +$71M for GSEW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEX or GSEW?
Over the past year, FEX had a volatility of 17.93%, while GSEW experienced 17.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEX or GSEW?
As of March 12, 2026, FEX holds $1.39 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSEW manages $1.60 B.
What sectors do the FEX and GSEW ETFs invest in?
FEX leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, GSEW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FEX ETF and GSEW ETF?
FEX top holdings include SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC, KYG3730V1059 and SCHLUMBERGER. GSEW holds in its top three: US92333F1012, US80004C2008 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FEX or GSEW?
FEX holds 374 securities with 7.76% of its assets in the top 15. GSEW has 497 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
