Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FEDMvsNTSIETF Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is part of the Alternatives segment. FEDM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, NTSI's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. FEDM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.26% for NTSI. FEDM is up 0.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. NTSI performs better with 0.78% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEDM and NTSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FEDM vs NTSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEDM NTSI | -5.47%-6.98% | +1.62%+2.17% | +0.57%+0.78% | +20.73%+20.87% | +49.12%+46.24% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FEDM NTSI | -- | +$2M+$16M | +$2M+$16M | +$16M+$36M | +$25M+$140M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEDM NTSI | +13.59%+14.09% | +15.00%+15.61% | +13.17%+13.69% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FEDM NTSI | -7.61%-8.21% | -12.85%-12.78% | -14.86%-13.88% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FEDM NTSI | 10d11d | 38d41d | 214d227d | n/an/a |
FEDM | NTSI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 4:14 PM | $58.74 | $44.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $59.88 | $45.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FEDM | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FEDM | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.74 | $44.40 |
| 1D performance | -1.90% | -1.54% |
| AuM | $76.19 M | $465.98 M |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.26% |
FEDM | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | FlexShares | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 211 | 428 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 21, 2021 | May 20, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FEDM and NTSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FEDM is up 0.57% year-to-date (YTD), while NTSI has returned 0.78%. That puts NTSI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEDM or NTSI?
Year-to-date, the FEDM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$16M for NTSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEDM or NTSI?
Over the past year, FEDM had a volatility of 15%, while NTSI experienced 15.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEDM or NTSI?
As of March 11, 2026, FEDM holds $76.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while NTSI manages $465.98 M.
What sectors do the FEDM and NTSI ETFs invest in?
FEDM leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, NTSI focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FEDM ETF and NTSI ETF?
FEDM top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and SIEMENS. NTSI holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FEDM or NTSI?
FEDM holds 220 securities with 21.78% of its assets in the top 15. NTSI has 451 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.82%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
