Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FEDMvsGSIEETF Comparison
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. FEDM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, GSIE's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. FEDM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.25% for GSIE. FEDM is up 0.57% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. GSIE performs better with 2.19% YTD performance, and +$216M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FEDM and GSIE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FEDM vs GSIE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEDM GSIE | -5.47%-4.88% | +1.62%+3.54% | +0.57%+2.19% | +20.73%+25.73% | +49.12%+60.66% | n/a+53.41% |
| Flows | FEDM GSIE | -+$41M | +$2M+$216M | +$2M+$216M | +$16M+$625M | +$25M+$711M | -+$1.79B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FEDM GSIE | +13.59%+13.10% | +15.00%+14.72% | +13.17%+12.87% | n/a+14.16% |
| Max drawdown | FEDM GSIE | -7.61%-7.37% | -12.85%-13.08% | -14.86%-13.08% | n/a-29.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | FEDM GSIE | 10d10d | 38d37d | 214d37d | n/a911d |
FEDM | GSIE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.31 | $42.84 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $58.74 | $43.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FEDM | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FEDM | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.31 | $42.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $76.19 M | $5.20 B |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.25% |
FEDM | GSIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 211 | 598 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 21, 2021 | November 6, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FEDM and GSIE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FEDM is up 0.57% year-to-date (YTD), while GSIE has returned 2.19%. That puts GSIE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FEDM or GSIE?
Year-to-date, the FEDM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$216M for GSIE.
Which ETF is more volatile: FEDM or GSIE?
Over the past year, FEDM had a volatility of 15%, while GSIE experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: FEDM or GSIE?
As of March 11, 2026, FEDM holds $76.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSIE manages $5.20 B.
What sectors do the FEDM and GSIE ETFs invest in?
FEDM leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSIE focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FEDM ETF and GSIE ETF?
FEDM top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and SIEMENS. GSIE holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FEDM or GSIE?
FEDM holds 220 securities with 21.78% of its assets in the top 15. GSIE has 629 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.67%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
