Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDVvsDIVGETF Comparison
Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) belong to the same industry segment: US High Dividend. FDV's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, DIVG's top sector exposures are Financials, Consumer Staples and Utilities. FDV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.39% for DIVG. FDV is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. DIVG performs worse with 5.94% YTD performance, and +$354K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDV and DIVG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDV vs DIVG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDV DIVG | -2.18%-3.23% | +8.87%+4.86% | +8.77%+5.94% | +12.24%+15.76% | +42.57%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FDV DIVG | +$22M+$354K | +$10M+$685K | -$20M+$354K | +$283M+$6M | +$498M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDV DIVG | +9.44%+11.13% | +13.88%+15.57% | +12.36%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FDV DIVG | -3.23%-3.37% | -11.93%-12.00% | -12.77%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FDV DIVG | 9d17d | 119d89d | 129dn/a | n/an/a |
FDV | DIVG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.73 | $34.17 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.87 | $34.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDV | DIVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDV | DIVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.73 | $34.17 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $617.66 M | $9.97 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.39% |
FDV | DIVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Federated Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 High Dividend Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 15, 2022 | December 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDV and DIVG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FDV is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD), while DIVG has returned 5.94%. That puts FDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDV or DIVG?
Year-to-date, the FDV ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$354K for DIVG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDV or DIVG?
Over the past year, FDV had a volatility of 13.88%, while DIVG experienced 15.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDV or DIVG?
As of March 10, 2026, FDV holds $617.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while DIVG manages $9.97 M.
What sectors do the FDV and DIVG ETFs invest in?
FDV leans toward sectors like Utilities, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, DIVG focuses on Financials, Consumer Staples and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the FDV ETF and DIVG ETF?
FDV top holdings include PNC FINL SVC, US and CHEVRON TEXACO. DIVG holds in its top three: LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES, CONAGRA BRANDS INC and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDV or DIVG?
FDV holds 49 securities with 44.14% of its assets in the top 15. DIVG has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.16%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
