Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDRSvsPCLGETF Comparison
Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FDRS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, PCLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. FDRS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.69% for PCLG. FDRS is down -11.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. PCLG performs worse with -11.96% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDRS and PCLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDRS vs PCLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDRS PCLG | -1.61%-1.75% | n/a-12.75% | -11.30%-11.96% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FDRS PCLG | +$2M-$10M | -+$3M | +$17M+$4M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDRS PCLG | n/a+16.62% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FDRS PCLG | n/a-15.05% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FDRS PCLG | n/a57d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FDRS | PCLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $21.73 | $21.46 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $21.53 | $21.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDRS | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDRS | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.73 | $21.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.93% | -1.51% |
| AuM | $25.77 M | $100.53 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.69% |
FDRS | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | FOUNDER ETFs | Polen Capital |
| Benchmark | Founder-Led Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 29, 2025 | September 29, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDRS and PCLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDRS is down -11.3% year-to-date (YTD), while PCLG has lost -11.96%. That puts FDRS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDRS or PCLG?
Year-to-date, the FDRS ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to +$4M for PCLG.
Which ETF is bigger: FDRS or PCLG?
As of March 11, 2026, FDRS holds $25.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while PCLG manages $100.53 M.
What sectors do the FDRS and PCLG ETFs invest in?
FDRS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, PCLG focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FDRS ETF and PCLG ETF?
FDRS top holdings include NVIDIA, META PLATFORMS and TESLA. PCLG holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, MICROSOFT-T and LILLY.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDRS or PCLG?
FDRS holds 50 securities with 69.14% of its assets in the top 15. PCLG has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.11%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
