Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDRSvsLRGGETF Comparison
Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. FDRS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, LRGG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. FDRS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.45% for LRGG. FDRS is down -13.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. LRGG performs better with -9.23% YTD performance, and -$51M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDRS and LRGG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDRS vs LRGG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDRS LRGG | -0.33%-0.48% | n/a-8.75% | -13.12%-9.23% | n/a+3.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FDRS LRGG | +$2M-$33M | --$50M | +$17M-$51M | -+$246M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDRS LRGG | n/a+15.23% | n/a+18.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FDRS LRGG | n/a-11.31% | n/a-13.48% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FDRS LRGG | n/a73d | n/a134d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
FDRS | LRGG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.26 | $26.39 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $21.73 | $26.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDRS | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDRS | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.26 | $26.39 |
| 1D performance | -2.16% | -1.71% |
| AuM | $25.25 M | $297.34 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.45% |
FDRS | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | FOUNDER ETFs | Macquarie |
| Benchmark | Founder-Led Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 23 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 29, 2025 | May 15, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDRS and LRGG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FDRS is down -13.12% year-to-date (YTD), while LRGG has lost -9.23%. That puts LRGG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDRS or LRGG?
Year-to-date, the FDRS ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$51M for LRGG.
Which ETF is bigger: FDRS or LRGG?
As of March 12, 2026, FDRS holds $25.25 M in assets under management (AUM), while LRGG manages $297.34 M.
What sectors do the FDRS and LRGG ETFs invest in?
FDRS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. Meanwhile, LRGG focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FDRS ETF and LRGG ETF?
FDRS top holdings include NVIDIA, META PLATFORMS and TESLA. LRGG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDRS or LRGG?
FDRS holds 50 securities with 69.14% of its assets in the top 15. LRGG has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.95%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
