Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDRRvsNACPETF Comparison
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
Fidelity Dividend for Rising Rates ETF (FDRR) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) is part of the segment. FDRR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, NACP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. FDRR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.49% for NACP. FDRR is up 0.07% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. NACP performs better with 0.53% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDRR and NACP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDRR vs NACP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDRR NACP | -3.26%-2.65% | -0.59%+0.11% | +0.07%+0.53% | +22.51%+26.02% | +68.87%+92.69% | +74.48%+89.33% |
| Flows | FDRR NACP | +$3M- | +$16M+$4M | +$3M- | +$16M-$5M | -$116M-$4M | +$95M+$15M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDRR NACP | +10.01%+13.35% | +16.56%+19.21% | +13.30%+15.32% | +14.70%+17.76% |
| Max drawdown | FDRR NACP | -3.82%-5.03% | -13.95%-14.44% | -17.87%-19.85% | -20.85%-27.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDRR NACP | 29d40d | 51d45d | 126d132d | 708d718d |
FDRR | NACP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.75 | $50.12 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $60.88 | $49.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDRR | NACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDRR | NACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.75 | $50.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | +0.40% |
| AuM | $663.74 M | $62.46 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.49% |
FDRR | NACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Impact Shares |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Dividend for Rising Rates Index | Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index |
| N° of holdings | 105 | 197 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2016 | July 18, 2018 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDRR and NACP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FDRR is up 0.07% year-to-date (YTD), while NACP has returned 0.53%. That puts NACP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDRR or NACP?
Year-to-date, the FDRR ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to - for NACP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDRR or NACP?
Over the past year, FDRR had a volatility of 16.56%, while NACP experienced 19.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDRR or NACP?
As of March 10, 2026, FDRR holds $663.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while NACP manages $62.46 M.
What sectors do the FDRR and NACP ETFs invest in?
FDRR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NACP focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FDRR ETF and NACP ETF?
FDRR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. NACP holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDRR or NACP?
FDRR holds 112 securities with 46.87% of its assets in the top 15. NACP has 201 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.66%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.