Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDMOvsNBCRETF Comparison
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF (NBCR) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FDMO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, NBCR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FDMO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.52% for NBCR. FDMO is down -1.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$77M in YTD flows. NBCR performs worse with -2.06% YTD performance, and +$147M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDMO and NBCR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDMO vs NBCR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDMO NBCR | -2.42%-2.37% | -2.60%-2.47% | -1.03%-2.06% | +30.79%+20.35% | +100.57%n/a | +90.90%n/a |
| Flows | FDMO NBCR | +$34M-$48M | +$98M+$154M | +$77M+$147M | +$32M+$516M | +$390M- | +$386M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDMO NBCR | +18.14%+10.89% | +22.15%+17.80% | +18.00%n/a | +19.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FDMO NBCR | -7.24%-4.32% | -14.84%-13.59% | -21.79%n/a | -25.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FDMO NBCR | 42d57d | 45d45d | 125dn/a | 778dn/a |
FDMO | NBCR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.49 | $30.40 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $83.06 | $30.81 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDMO | NBCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDMO | NBCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.49 | $30.40 |
| 1D performance | -1.89% | -1.33% |
| AuM | $676.95 M | $822.88 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.52% |
FDMO | NBCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Fidelity | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 115 | 192 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2016 | August 1, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDMO and NBCR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDMO is down -1.03% year-to-date (YTD), while NBCR has lost -2.06%. That puts FDMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDMO or NBCR?
Year-to-date, the FDMO ETF saw +$77M in flows, compared to +$147M for NBCR.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDMO or NBCR?
Over the past year, FDMO had a volatility of 22.15%, while NBCR experienced 17.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDMO or NBCR?
As of March 11, 2026, FDMO holds $676.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBCR manages $822.88 M.
What sectors do the FDMO and NBCR ETFs invest in?
FDMO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, NBCR focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FDMO ETF and NBCR ETF?
FDMO top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. NBCR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDMO or NBCR?
FDMO holds 123 securities with 46.14% of its assets in the top 15. NBCR has 200 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
