Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDLSvsSMMDETF Comparison
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FDLS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, SMMD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. FDLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.23% for SMMD. FDLS is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. SMMD performs worse with 1.28% YTD performance, and +$62M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDLS and SMMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDLS vs SMMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDLS SMMD | -3.20%-4.64% | +1.26%-0.52% | +5.12%+1.28% | +33.53%+22.91% | +67.33%+50.03% | n/a+25.16% |
| Flows | FDLS SMMD | +$12M+$105M | +$38M+$126M | +$33M+$62M | +$62M+$678M | +$79M+$1.36B | -+$1.70B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDLS SMMD | +16.01%+17.13% | +21.01%+22.05% | +18.41%+19.24% | n/a+20.92% |
| Max drawdown | FDLS SMMD | -5.30%-6.97% | -15.34%-15.86% | -23.13%-25.55% | n/a-28.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDLS SMMD | 13d14d | 46d46d | 219d283d | n/a980d |
FDLS | SMMD | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.61 | $75.81 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.78 | $76.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDLS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDLS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.61 | $75.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $165.26 M | $2.28 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.23% |
FDLS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Inspire ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index | Russell 2500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 2075 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 23, 2022 | July 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDLS and SMMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLS is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD), while SMMD has returned 1.28%. That puts FDLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDLS or SMMD?
Year-to-date, the FDLS ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$62M for SMMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDLS or SMMD?
Over the past year, FDLS had a volatility of 21.01%, while SMMD experienced 22.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDLS or SMMD?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLS holds $165.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMMD manages $2.28 B.
What sectors do the FDLS and SMMD ETFs invest in?
FDLS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SMMD focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FDLS ETF and SMMD ETF?
FDLS top holdings include MKS INSTRUMENTS, INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP and NATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES REUNITED. SMMD holds in its top three: US80004C2008, COMFORT SYSTEMS USA and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDLS or SMMD?
FDLS holds 89 securities with 18.11% of its assets in the top 15. SMMD has 2438 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.56%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
