Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDLSvsOASCETF Comparison
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF (OASC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. FDLS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, OASC's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. FDLS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 1.38% for OASC. FDLS is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. OASC performs worse with 1.33% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDLS and OASC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDLS vs OASC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDLS OASC | -3.20%-3.97% | +1.26%-1.45% | +5.12%+1.33% | +33.53%+20.71% | +67.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FDLS OASC | +$12M-$6K | +$38M+$18K | +$33M+$2M | +$62M+$46M | +$79M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDLS OASC | +16.01%+16.10% | +21.01%+21.89% | +18.41%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FDLS OASC | -5.30%-5.61% | -15.34%-15.33% | -23.13%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FDLS OASC | 13d13d | 46d49d | 219dn/a | n/an/a |
FDLS | OASC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.61 | $29.22 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.78 | $29.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDLS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDLS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.61 | $29.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $165.26 M | $70.75 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 1.38% |
FDLS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Inspire ETFs | OneAscent Investments |
| Benchmark | WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 171 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 23, 2022 | June 13, 2024 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDLS and OASC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLS is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD), while OASC has returned 1.33%. That puts FDLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDLS or OASC?
Year-to-date, the FDLS ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$2M for OASC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDLS or OASC?
Over the past year, FDLS had a volatility of 21.01%, while OASC experienced 21.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDLS or OASC?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLS holds $165.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while OASC manages $70.75 M.
What sectors do the FDLS and OASC ETFs invest in?
FDLS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, OASC focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FDLS ETF and OASC ETF?
FDLS top holdings include MKS INSTRUMENTS, INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP and NATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES REUNITED. OASC holds in its top three: CNA FINANCIAL, CINCINNATI FINANCIAL and SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDLS or OASC?
FDLS holds 89 securities with 18.11% of its assets in the top 15. OASC has 172 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.84%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
