Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDLSvsESMLETF Comparison
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML) is part of the US Small Cap segment. FDLS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, ESML's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. FDLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.17% for ESML. FDLS is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. ESML performs worse with 1.74% YTD performance, and +$108M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDLS and ESML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDLS vs ESML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDLS ESML | -3.20%-4.91% | +1.26%-0.15% | +5.12%+1.74% | +33.53%+22.74% | +67.33%+47.88% | n/a+24.30% |
| Flows | FDLS ESML | +$12M+$15M | +$38M+$120M | +$33M+$108M | +$62M+$77M | +$79M+$267M | -+$1.18B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDLS ESML | +16.01%+16.37% | +21.01%+22.25% | +18.41%+19.77% | n/a+21.35% |
| Max drawdown | FDLS ESML | -5.30%-6.97% | -15.34%-16.43% | -23.13%-26.61% | n/a-28.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDLS ESML | 13d14d | 46d46d | 219d296d | n/a980d |
FDLS | ESML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.61 | $46.65 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.78 | $46.77 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDLS | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDLS | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.61 | $46.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.46% | -0.26% |
| AuM | $165.26 M | $2.19 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.17% |
FDLS | ESML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Inspire ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index | MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 814 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 23, 2022 | April 10, 2018 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDLS and ESML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLS is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD), while ESML has returned 1.74%. That puts FDLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDLS or ESML?
Year-to-date, the FDLS ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$108M for ESML.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDLS or ESML?
Over the past year, FDLS had a volatility of 21.01%, while ESML experienced 22.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDLS or ESML?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLS holds $165.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESML manages $2.19 B.
What sectors do the FDLS and ESML ETFs invest in?
FDLS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, ESML focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FDLS ETF and ESML ETF?
FDLS top holdings include MKS INSTRUMENTS, INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP and NATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES REUNITED. ESML holds in its top three: US80004C2008, US86765Q1067 and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDLS or ESML?
FDLS holds 89 securities with 18.11% of its assets in the top 15. ESML has 899 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.99%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.