FDLSvsBFORETF Comparison
VS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and BARRON’S 400 ETF (BFOR) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FDLS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, BFOR's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. FDLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.65% for BFOR. FDLS is up 15.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$107M in YTD flows. BFOR performs worse with 13.81% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDLS and BFOR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FDLS vs BFOR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDLS BFOR | -3.02%+2.18% | -4.23%-0.89% | +15.02%+13.81% | +18.17%+17.95% | +73.69%+79.63% | n/a+54.95% |
| Flows | FDLS BFOR | +$10M+$8M | +$31M+$11M | +$107M+$27M | +$121M+$29M | +$142M+$31M | -+$18M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDLS BFOR | +12.35%+10.76% | +16.03%+13.78% | +18.12%+16.84% | n/a+19.33% |
| Max drawdown | FDLS BFOR | -6.97%-6.98% | -9.10%-8.35% | -23.13%-21.70% | n/a-26.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDLS BFOR | 77d75d | 46d49d | 219d219d | n/a815d |
Trading data
FDLS | BFOR | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $40.85 | $23.40 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $41.22 | $23.44 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FDLS | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
FDLS | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.85 | $23.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.89% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $252.13 M | $241.23 M |
| E/R | 0.66% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
FDLS | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Inspire ETFs | ALPS |
| Benchmark | WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index | Barron's 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 401 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 23, 2022 | June 3, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FDLS
USA
86.09%
Other
13.91%
BFOR
USA
96.16%
Other
3.84%
Sectors
FDLS
Technology
20.22%
Finance
18.6%
Healthcare
14.9%
Industrials
13.25%
Energy
10.49%
Other
22.54%
BFOR
Finance
21.95%
Technology
18.18%
Healthcare
12.33%
Industrials
12.25%
Energy
10.53%
Other
24.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
FDLS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.73%
BFOR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FDLS
Viavi Solutions, Inc.
1.23%
Sandisk Corp.
1.18%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.17%
Entegris, Inc.
1.17%
MKS, Inc.
1.13%
Sanmina Corp.
1.13%
Microchip Technology, Inc.
1.12%
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
1.08%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
1.08%
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
1.08%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.08%
nVent Electric Plc
1.07%
KE Holdings, Inc.
1.07%
EnerSys
1.07%
Centuri Holdings, Inc.
1.07%
BFOR
State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund
0.54%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.37%
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.35%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
0.33%
Twilio, Inc.
0.32%
CareDx, Inc.
0.32%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.31%
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.31%
Lam Research Corp.
0.30%
Innodata, Inc.
0.30%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.30%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.30%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.30%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
0.30%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.29%
Frequently asked questions about FDLS and BFOR
How have the FDLS and BFOR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, FDLS is up 15.02% year-to-date (YTD), while BFOR has returned 13.81%. That puts FDLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDLS or BFOR?
Year-to-date, the FDLS ETF saw +$107M in flows, compared to +$27M for BFOR.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDLS or BFOR?
Over the past year, FDLS had a volatility of 16.03%, while BFOR experienced 13.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDLS or BFOR?
As of November 2, 2026, FDLS holds $252.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while BFOR manages $241.23 M.
What sectors do the FDLS and BFOR ETFs invest in?
FDLS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, BFOR focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FDLS ETF and BFOR ETF?
FDLS top holdings include Viavi Solutions, Inc., Sandisk Corp. and Teradyne, Inc.. BFOR holds in its top three: State Street Institutional Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, FormFactor, Inc. and Astera Labs, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FDLS or BFOR?
FDLS holds 101 securities with 16.73% of its assets in the top 15. BFOR has 401 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.95%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
