Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDLOvsNACPETF Comparison
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) is part of the segment. FDLO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, NACP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. FDLO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.49% for NACP. FDLO is up 0.11% year-to-date (YTD) with -$50M in YTD flows. NACP performs better with 0.89% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDLO and NACP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDLO vs NACP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDLO NACP | -2.16%-2.59% | -0.58%+0.42% | +0.11%+0.89% | +12.62%+27.64% | +55.19%+93.73% | +66.13%+87.60% |
| Flows | FDLO NACP | -$13M- | -$67M+$4M | -$50M- | -$49M-$5M | +$605M-$4M | +$630M+$15M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDLO NACP | +7.90%+13.37% | +13.86%+19.18% | +11.22%+15.32% | +13.35%+17.75% |
| Max drawdown | FDLO NACP | -2.53%-5.03% | -10.59%-14.44% | -13.57%-19.85% | -19.20%-27.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDLO NACP | 37d41d | 48d45d | 131d132d | 688d718d |
FDLO | NACP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.89 | $50.12 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $67.09 | $49.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDLO | NACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDLO | NACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.89 | $50.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | +0.40% |
| AuM | $1.43 B | $62.68 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.49% |
FDLO | NACP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | Impact Shares |
| Benchmark | Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index | Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index |
| N° of holdings | 122 | 197 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2016 | July 18, 2018 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDLO and NACP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLO is up 0.11% year-to-date (YTD), while NACP has returned 0.89%. That puts NACP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDLO or NACP?
Year-to-date, the FDLO ETF saw -$50M in flows, compared to - for NACP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDLO or NACP?
Over the past year, FDLO had a volatility of 13.86%, while NACP experienced 19.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDLO or NACP?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLO holds $1.43 B in assets under management (AUM), while NACP manages $62.68 M.
What sectors do the FDLO and NACP ETFs invest in?
FDLO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, NACP focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the FDLO ETF and NACP ETF?
FDLO top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. NACP holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDLO or NACP?
FDLO holds 125 securities with 45.79% of its assets in the top 15. NACP has 201 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.66%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.