Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDLOvsBWVTFETF Comparison
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. FDLO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, BWVTF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. FDLO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.75% for BWVTF. FDLO is up 0.11% year-to-date (YTD) with -$50M in YTD flows. BWVTF performs better with 1.53% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDLO and BWVTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDLO vs BWVTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDLO BWVTF | -2.16%-0.26% | -0.58%+2.85% | +0.11%+1.53% | +12.62%+16.11% | +55.19%+47.28% | +66.13%+51.46% |
| Flows | FDLO BWVTF | -$13M- | -$67M- | -$50M- | -$49M-$715K | +$605M-$900K | +$630M-$1M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDLO BWVTF | +7.90%+7.53% | +13.86%+15.11% | +11.22%+11.12% | +13.35%+12.21% |
| Max drawdown | FDLO BWVTF | -2.53%-1.82% | -10.59%-11.76% | -13.57%-16.79% | -19.20%-19.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDLO BWVTF | 37d13d | 48d91d | 131d240d | 688d686d |
FDLO | BWVTF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.17 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $66.89 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDLO | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDLO | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.17 | – |
| 1D performance | -1.08% | – |
| AuM | $1.43 B | $1.57 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.75% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDLO and BWVTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLO is up 0.11% year-to-date (YTD), while BWVTF has returned 1.53%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDLO or BWVTF?
Year-to-date, the FDLO ETF saw -$50M in flows, compared to - for BWVTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDLO or BWVTF?
Over the past year, FDLO had a volatility of 13.86%, while BWVTF experienced 15.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDLO or BWVTF?
As of March 11, 2026, FDLO holds $1.43 B in assets under management (AUM), while BWVTF manages $1.57 M.
What sectors do the FDLO and BWVTF ETFs invest in?
FDLO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, BWVTF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FDLO ETF and BWVTF ETF?
FDLO top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. BWVTF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDLO or BWVTF?
FDLO holds 125 securities with 45.79% of its assets in the top 15. BWVTF has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.54%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
