FDIGvsIBLCETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) is part of the Blockchain segment. FDIG's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Business Services. In contrast, IBLC's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Non-Corporate. FDIG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.47% for IBLC. FDIG is down -12.7% year-to-date (YTD) with -$36M in YTD flows. IBLC performs worse with -13.6% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDIG and IBLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FDIG vs IBLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDIG IBLC | -20.88%-22.38% | -20.36%-20.81% | -12.70%-13.60% | -34.65%-37.64% | +123.07%+144.21% | n/an/a |
| Flows | FDIG IBLC | -$6M- | -$10M-$2M | -$36M-$6M | -$25M+$5M | +$123M+$57M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDIG IBLC | +40.99%+50.81% | +48.34%+57.91% | +56.03%+62.09% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FDIG IBLC | -28.93%-31.03% | -41.03%-41.24% | -48.88%-51.49% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FDIG IBLC | 38d38d | 361d361d | 274d274d | n/an/a |
Trading data
FDIG | IBLC | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 7:50 PM | $32.36 | $35.41 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $33.29 | $38.11 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FDIG | IBLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 7:50 PM
Live
Closed
FDIG | IBLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.36 | $35.41 |
| 1D performance | -2.79% | -7.09% |
| AuM | $195.29 M | $63.87 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
FDIG | IBLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index | NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 41 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 19, 2022 | April 27, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FDIG
USA
73.3%
Other
26.7%
IBLC
USA
78.52%
Australia
8.89%
Other
12.59%
Sectors
FDIG
Finance
83.6%
Technology
13.2%
Other
3.2%
IBLC
Finance
64.23%
Technology
33.6%
Other
2.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
FDIG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.26%
IBLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
80.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FDIG
IREN Ltd.
5.68%
Coinbase Global, Inc.
5.64%
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
4.68%
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
4.64%
MARA Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
Cipher Digital, Inc.
3.29%
Hut 8 Corp.
3.24%
Applied Digital Corp.
3.22%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
3.21%
TeraWulf, Inc.
3.13%
CleanSpark, Inc.
2.79%
Block, Inc.
2.67%
Core Scientific, Inc.
2.26%
Keel Infrastructure Corp.
2.13%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
2.10%
IBLC
Coinbase Global, Inc.
12.74%
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
10.02%
IREN Ltd.
8.89%
Hut 8 Corp.
6.12%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.39%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
4.47%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.17%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
4.09%
Applied Digital Corp.
4.09%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.00%
International Business Machines Corp.
3.44%
Cipher Digital, Inc.
3.44%
TeraWulf, Inc.
3.30%
Core Scientific, Inc.
3.13%
Galaxy Digital, Inc.
2.75%
Frequently asked questions about FDIG and IBLC
How have the FDIG and IBLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, FDIG is down -12.7% year-to-date (YTD), while IBLC has lost -13.6%. That puts FDIG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDIG or IBLC?
Year-to-date, the FDIG ETF saw -$36M in flows, compared to -$6M for IBLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDIG or IBLC?
Over the past year, FDIG had a volatility of 48.34%, while IBLC experienced 57.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDIG or IBLC?
As of October 30, 2026, FDIG holds $195.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while IBLC manages $63.87 M.
What sectors do the FDIG and IBLC ETFs invest in?
FDIG leans toward sectors like Finance and Technology. Meanwhile, IBLC focuses on Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FDIG ETF and IBLC ETF?
FDIG top holdings include IREN Ltd., Coinbase Global, Inc. and Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. IBLC holds in its top three: Coinbase Global, Inc., Circle Internet Group, Inc. and IREN Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: FDIG or IBLC?
FDIG holds 57 securities with 52.26% of its assets in the top 15. IBLC has 41 securities and a top 15 weight of 80.03%.
Advertisement
Latest news about FDIG & IBLC
Coinbase Stocks Jump as Binance Pleads Guilty to Federal Charges of Money Laundering
November 28, 2023
FDIG
IBLC
Advertisement
Advertisement
