Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FDEVvsINTFETF Comparison
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) and iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. FDEV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, INTF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. FDEV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.16% for INTF. FDEV is up 2.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$25M in YTD flows. INTF performs worse with 2.54% YTD performance, and +$136M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDEV and INTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FDEV vs INTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDEV INTF | -4.59%-5.58% | +4.51%+4.23% | +2.92%+2.54% | +25.71%+27.82% | +58.21%+68.59% | +49.81%+61.80% |
| Flows | FDEV INTF | +$7M+$49M | +$32M+$169M | +$25M+$136M | +$111M+$1.27B | +$195M+$1.48B | +$205M+$1.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDEV INTF | +11.60%+14.93% | +12.80%+15.97% | +11.23%+14.03% | +12.63%+15.41% |
| Max drawdown | FDEV INTF | -5.76%-7.35% | -9.93%-13.30% | -9.93%-13.30% | -28.58%-29.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDEV INTF | 11d11d | 29d37d | 29d37d | 1037d872d |
FDEV | INTF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.34 | $38.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.67 | $38.77 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FDEV | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FDEV | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.34 | $38.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.92% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $260.14 M | $3.10 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.16% |
FDEV | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Benchmark | Fidelity International Multifactor Index | STOXX International Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 198 | 444 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 26, 2020 | April 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FDEV and INTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FDEV is up 2.92% year-to-date (YTD), while INTF has returned 2.54%. That puts FDEV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDEV or INTF?
Year-to-date, the FDEV ETF saw +$25M in flows, compared to +$136M for INTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDEV or INTF?
Over the past year, FDEV had a volatility of 12.8%, while INTF experienced 15.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDEV or INTF?
As of March 12, 2026, FDEV holds $260.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while INTF manages $3.10 B.
What sectors do the FDEV and INTF ETFs invest in?
FDEV leans toward sectors like Financials, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, INTF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the FDEV ETF and INTF ETF?
FDEV top holdings include FRESNILLO PLC, PSP SWISS PROPERTY and KINROSS GOLD. INTF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FDEV or INTF?
FDEV holds 207 securities with 22.13% of its assets in the top 15. INTF has 469 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.12%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
