FDEMvsEMGFETF Comparison
VS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. FDEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.26% for EMGF. FDEM is up 18.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$160M in YTD flows. EMGF performs better with 25.54% YTD performance, and +$270M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FDEM and EMGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FDEM vs EMGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FDEM EMGF | +2.53%+4.12% | -3.95%-4.81% | +18.80%+25.54% | +28.77%+38.24% | +76.84%+91.79% | +60.46%+61.21% |
| Flows | FDEM EMGF | +$7M+$7M | +$7M+$50M | +$160M+$270M | +$293M+$543M | +$460M+$705M | +$469M+$762M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FDEM EMGF | +23.53%+30.18% | +19.29%+22.47% | +15.20%+17.33% | +14.38%+16.73% |
| Max drawdown | FDEM EMGF | -10.37%-14.42% | -12.46%-14.42% | -13.80%-16.15% | -25.07%-27.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | FDEM EMGF | 92d72d | 64d72d | 225d220d | 916d1036d |
Trading data
FDEM | EMGF | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.30 | $72.19 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $36.14 | $71.96 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FDEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FDEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.30 | $72.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.32% |
| AuM | $597.24 M | $1.93 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
FDEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index | STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 185 | 652 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 26, 2019 | December 8, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FDEM
China
22.81%
Taiwan
21.14%
Republic of Korea
18.02%
India
9.26%
Other
28.77%
EMGF
Taiwan
23.62%
China
22.45%
Republic of Korea
17.51%
India
13.41%
Other
23.01%
Sectors
FDEM
Technology
36.48%
Finance
24.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.74%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.78%
Energy
8.11%
Other
12.87%
EMGF
Technology
38%
Finance
22.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.8%
Industrials
7.54%
Other
24.32%
Advertisement
Diversification
FDEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.34%
EMGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FDEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
11.93%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.33%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.38%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
3.25%
Fibra Uno Administración SA de CV
1.88%
ORION Corp. (Korea)
1.68%
China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd.
1.67%
Kimberly-Clark de México SAB de CV
1.60%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.58%
Emaar Development PJSC
1.53%
Britannia Industries Ltd.
1.40%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.33%
Hengan International Group Co., Ltd.
1.30%
Inner Mongolia Yitai Coal Co., Ltd.
1.27%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.20%
EMGF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.20%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
5.68%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.74%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
3.12%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
2.11%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.34%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.11%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.90%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.84%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.66%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.66%
Bank of China Ltd.
0.64%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.64%
Vale SA
0.59%
Yuanta Financial Holding Co. Ltd.
0.55%
Frequently asked questions about FDEM and EMGF
How have the FDEM and EMGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, FDEM is up 18.8% year-to-date (YTD), while EMGF has returned 25.54%. That puts EMGF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FDEM or EMGF?
Year-to-date, the FDEM ETF saw +$160M in flows, compared to +$270M for EMGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: FDEM or EMGF?
Over the past year, FDEM had a volatility of 19.29%, while EMGF experienced 22.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: FDEM or EMGF?
As of September 2, 2026, FDEM holds $597.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMGF manages $1.93 B.
What sectors do the FDEM and EMGF ETFs invest in?
FDEM leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, EMGF focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the FDEM ETF and EMGF ETF?
FDEM top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. EMGF holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FDEM or EMGF?
FDEM holds 185 securities with 42.34% of its assets in the top 15. EMGF has 671 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.77%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
