FCUSvsIALTETF Comparison
VS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. FCUS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Energy and Non-Energy Materials. FCUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.99% for IALT. FCUS is up 16.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. IALT performs worse with 12.71% YTD performance, and +$5.01B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCUS and IALT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCUS vs IALT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUS IALT | -18.20%+0.58% | -6.72%+3.70% | +16.58%+12.71% | +42.74%n/a | +87.21%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | FCUS IALT | +$3M+$450M | +$28M+$4.92B | +$33M+$5.01B | +$32M- | +$62M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCUS IALT | +43.46%+6.85% | +38.33%n/a | +32.62%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | FCUS IALT | -23.05%-2.28% | -23.05%n/a | -39.84%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FCUS IALT | 44d43d | 44dn/a | 251dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
FCUS | IALT | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.45 | $28.38 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $36.03 | $28.45 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FCUS | IALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.45 | $28.38 |
| 1D performance | +1.17% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $81.22 M | $5.11 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.99% |
Characteristics
FCUS | IALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Pinnacle Dynamic Funds | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 30 | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2022 | December 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FCUS
USA
99.73%
Other
0.27%
IALT
Data will be available soon
Sectors
FCUS
Technology
53.32%
Energy
17.06%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.89%
Industrials
9.39%
Other
9.34%
IALT
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
FCUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.61%
IALT
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
FCUS
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.13%
Sandisk Corp.
5.08%
Intel Corp.
5.06%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
5.04%
Western Digital Corp.
4.69%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.55%
Ciena Corp.
4.43%
Bloom Energy Corp.
4.20%
SiTime Corp.
3.99%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
3.68%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.68%
Alcoa Corp.
3.68%
Teradyne, Inc.
3.45%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.02%
Five Below, Inc.
2.93%
IALT
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FCUS and IALT
How have the FCUS and IALT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, FCUS is up 16.58% year-to-date (YTD), while IALT has returned 12.71%. That puts FCUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCUS or IALT?
Year-to-date, the FCUS ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$5.01B for IALT.
Which ETF is bigger: FCUS or IALT?
As of July 17, 2026, FCUS holds $81.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while IALT manages $5.11 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
