Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCTRvsGSEWETF Comparison
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, GSEW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. FCTR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.09% for GSEW. FCTR is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. GSEW performs better with 1.97% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCTR and GSEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCTR vs GSEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCTR GSEW | -2.88%-2.47% | -0.63%+0.37% | +0.17%+1.97% | +18.34%+16.99% | +40.44%+58.43% | +7.44%+52.21% |
| Flows | FCTR GSEW | -$2M+$45M | -$2M+$118M | -$2M+$71M | -$20M+$299M | -$186M+$812M | -$29M+$716M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCTR GSEW | +16.34%+12.44% | +20.93%+17.69% | +18.61%+14.48% | +19.89%+16.96% |
| Max drawdown | FCTR GSEW | -6.09%-3.47% | -12.75%-13.46% | -22.60%-18.23% | -37.23%-25.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCTR GSEW | 49d13d | 37d46d | 231d211d | 1186d834d |
FCTR | GSEW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.70 | $85.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.73 | $85.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FCTR | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FCTR | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.70 | $85.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $51.80 M | $1.60 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.09% |
FCTR | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index | Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 152 | 469 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 25, 2018 | December 9, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCTR and GSEW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, FCTR is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD), while GSEW has returned 1.97%. That puts GSEW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCTR or GSEW?
Year-to-date, the FCTR ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$71M for GSEW.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCTR or GSEW?
Over the past year, FCTR had a volatility of 20.93%, while GSEW experienced 17.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCTR or GSEW?
As of March 12, 2026, FCTR holds $51.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSEW manages $1.60 B.
What sectors do the FCTR and GSEW ETFs invest in?
FCTR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSEW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FCTR ETF and GSEW ETF?
FCTR top holdings include US7731211089, WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY and WESTERN DIGITAL. GSEW holds in its top three: US92333F1012, US80004C2008 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCTR or GSEW?
FCTR holds 159 securities with 27.21% of its assets in the top 15. GSEW has 497 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
