Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCTEvsCWSETF Comparison
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FCTE's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CWS's top sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. FCTE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.79% for CWS. FCTE is up 3.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. CWS performs worse with -3.15% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCTE and CWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCTE vs CWS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCTE CWS | -4.35%-1.04% | +2.33%-5.59% | +3.93%-3.15% | +3.13%+3.33% | n/a+39.86% | n/a+53.01% |
| Flows | FCTE CWS | +$3M-$6M | -$8M-$14M | +$2M-$10M | -$200M-$17M | -+$93M | -+$106M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCTE CWS | +16.87%+14.57% | +20.26%+16.27% | n/a+14.04% | n/a+15.72% |
| Max drawdown | FCTE CWS | -6.30%-7.73% | -13.39%-10.33% | n/a-16.20% | n/a-23.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCTE CWS | 43d51d | 45d29d | n/a404d | n/a532d |
FCTE | CWS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.41 | $65.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.44 | $65.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FCTE | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.41 | $65.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $221.91 M | $163.61 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.79% |
FCTE | CWS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | 3Fourteen & SMI Advisory Services | AdvisorShares |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 20 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 2, 2024 | September 20, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCTE and CWS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FCTE is up 3.93% year-to-date (YTD), while CWS has lost -3.15%. That puts FCTE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCTE or CWS?
Year-to-date, the FCTE ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$10M for CWS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCTE or CWS?
Over the past year, FCTE had a volatility of 20.26%, while CWS experienced 16.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCTE or CWS?
As of March 11, 2026, FCTE holds $221.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while CWS manages $163.61 M.
What sectors do the FCTE and CWS ETFs invest in?
FCTE leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CWS focuses on Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FCTE ETF and CWS ETF?
FCTE top holdings include TRACTOR SUPPLY, LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC and CARDINAL HEALTH. CWS holds in its top three: COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MUELLER INDUSTRIES and ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCTE or CWS?
FCTE holds 20 securities with 75.51% of its assets in the top 15. CWS has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
