FCTEvsBIBLETF Comparison
VS
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FCTE's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, BIBL's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. FCTE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. FCTE is up 18.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 19.71% YTD performance, and +$86M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCTE and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCTE vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCTE BIBL | +4.85%-0.31% | +2.13%-3.26% | +18.25%+19.71% | +13.94%+21.18% | n/a+75.54% | n/a+50.00% |
| Flows | FCTE BIBL | +$753K+$27M | -$5M+$38M | -$9M+$86M | -$79M+$97M | -+$43M | -+$144M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCTE BIBL | +14.82%+15.77% | +16.05%+17.79% | n/a+17.77% | n/a+20.22% |
| Max drawdown | FCTE BIBL | -8.68%-6.85% | -12.84%-9.07% | n/a-20.33% | n/a-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCTE BIBL | 64d59d | 86d56d | n/a233d | n/a812d |
Trading data
FCTE | BIBL | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:57 PM | $29.32 | $53.37 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $29.30 | $52.91 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FCTE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexFCTE | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:57 PM
Live
Closed
FCTE | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.32 | $53.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | +0.87% |
| AuM | $241.74 M | $511.59 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.41% |
Characteristics
FCTE | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | 3Fourteen & SMI Advisory Services | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 20 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 2, 2024 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FCTE
USA
100.09%
Other
-0.09%
BIBL
USA
99.4%
Other
0.6%
Sectors
FCTE
Technology
40.18%
Industrials
29.94%
Healthcare
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.96%
Other
9.94%
BIBL
Technology
32.02%
Industrials
20.63%
Finance
19.57%
Energy
8.02%
Other
19.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
FCTE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.23%
BIBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.01%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FCTE
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
5.08%
Jabil, Inc.
5.05%
Apple, Inc.
5.04%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
5.03%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
5.03%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.02%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.02%
Amphenol Corp.
5.02%
Lam Research Corp.
5.00%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
5.00%
AMETEK, Inc.
5.00%
Lockheed Martin Corp.
4.99%
Johnson & Johnson
4.99%
Monster Beverage Corp.
4.99%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.99%
BIBL
Caterpillar, Inc.
7.27%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.49%
KLA Corp.
4.37%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.95%
Amphenol Corp.
3.95%
Welltower, Inc.
3.52%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.76%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.75%
The Progressive Corp.
2.68%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.64%
SLB Ltd.
2.35%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.10%
Cintas Corp.
1.88%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
1.68%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
1.59%
Frequently asked questions about FCTE and BIBL
How have the FCTE and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, FCTE is up 18.25% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 19.71%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCTE or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the FCTE ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to +$86M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCTE or BIBL?
Over the past year, FCTE had a volatility of 16.05%, while BIBL experienced 17.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCTE or BIBL?
As of October 15, 2026, FCTE holds $241.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $511.59 M.
What sectors do the FCTE and BIBL ETFs invest in?
FCTE leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the FCTE ETF and BIBL ETF?
FCTE top holdings include Texas Pacific Land Corp., Jabil, Inc. and Apple, Inc.. BIBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., Arista Networks, Inc. and KLA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FCTE or BIBL?
FCTE holds 20 securities with 75.23% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.01%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
