Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCTEvsBIBLETF Comparison
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) and Inspire 100 ESG ETF (BIBL) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. FCTE's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, BIBL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate. FCTE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. FCTE is up 3.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 7.07% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCTE and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCTE vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCTE BIBL | -4.35%-4.24% | +2.33%+4.41% | +3.93%+7.07% | +3.13%+28.13% | n/a+66.51% | n/a+55.21% |
| Flows | FCTE BIBL | +$3M+$2M | -$8M+$5M | +$2M+$5M | -$200M+$15M | --$45M | -+$118M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCTE BIBL | +16.87%+17.58% | +20.26%+20.10% | n/a+16.99% | n/a+19.62% |
| Max drawdown | FCTE BIBL | -6.30%-4.94% | -13.39%-14.51% | n/a-20.33% | n/a-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCTE BIBL | 43d28d | 45d45d | n/a233d | n/a812d |
FCTE | BIBL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.41 | $47.37 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.44 | $47.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FCTE | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FCTE | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.41 | $47.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $221.91 M | $391.23 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.41% |
FCTE | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | 3Fourteen & SMI Advisory Services | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 20 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 2, 2024 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCTE and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, FCTE is up 3.93% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 7.07%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCTE or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the FCTE ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$5M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCTE or BIBL?
Over the past year, FCTE had a volatility of 20.26%, while BIBL experienced 20.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCTE or BIBL?
As of March 11, 2026, FCTE holds $221.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $391.23 M.
What sectors do the FCTE and BIBL ETFs invest in?
FCTE leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the FCTE ETF and BIBL ETF?
FCTE top holdings include TRACTOR SUPPLY, LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC and CARDINAL HEALTH. BIBL holds in its top three: CATERPILLAR, KLA CORPORATION and ARISTA NETWORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCTE or BIBL?
FCTE holds 20 securities with 75.51% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.88%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
