Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FCFYvsBMVPETF Comparison
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. FCFY's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, BMVP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. FCFY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.29% for BMVP. FCFY is down -6.62% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. BMVP performs better with 4.95% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCFY and BMVP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCFY vs BMVP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCFY BMVP | -6.08%-2.51% | -7.40%+3.04% | -6.62%+4.95% | +11.16%+10.86% | n/a+52.70% | n/a+40.31% |
| Flows | FCFY BMVP | -- | --$1M | --$1M | -$7K-$16M | --$22M | --$50M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCFY BMVP | +16.50%+10.61% | +22.71%+14.35% | n/a+12.52% | n/a+16.47% |
| Max drawdown | FCFY BMVP | -9.09%-3.25% | -15.68%-11.10% | n/a-15.00% | n/a-26.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCFY BMVP | 63d31d | 46d43d | n/a374d | n/a799d |
FCFY | BMVP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.68 | $51.20 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $25.80 | $51.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FCFY | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FCFY | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.68 | $51.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.44% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $1.29 M | $102.43 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.29% |
FCFY | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index | Bloomberg MVP Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 56 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 24, 2023 | May 1, 2003 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FCFY and BMVP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FCFY is down -6.62% year-to-date (YTD), while BMVP has returned 4.95%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCFY or BMVP?
Year-to-date, the FCFY ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$1M for BMVP.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCFY or BMVP?
Over the past year, FCFY had a volatility of 22.71%, while BMVP experienced 14.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCFY or BMVP?
As of March 10, 2026, FCFY holds $1.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while BMVP manages $102.43 M.
What sectors do the FCFY and BMVP ETFs invest in?
FCFY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BMVP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FCFY ETF and BMVP ETF?
FCFY top holdings include SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTN and FOX CORP. BMVP holds in its top three: HALLIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN and HOME DEPOT.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCFY or BMVP?
FCFY holds 101 securities with 35.67% of its assets in the top 15. BMVP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.68%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
