FCALvsCGMUETF Comparison
First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF (FCAL) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. In contrast, CGMU's top sector exposures are Municipal. FCAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.27% for CGMU. FCAL is down -1.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. CGMU performs better with -1.36% YTD performance, and +$2.64B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCAL and CGMU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FCAL vs CGMU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCAL CGMU | -0.62%-0.28% | -4.20%-2.91% | -1.43%-1.36% | -0.70%-0.49% | +6.77%+13.41% | -2.88%n/a |
| Flows | FCAL CGMU | -$2M+$514M | +$122K+$1.03B | +$20M+$2.64B | +$30M+$3.20B | +$70M+$7.09B | +$124M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCAL CGMU | +5.14%+4.29% | +3.26%+2.74% | +3.66%+3.16% | +3.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown | FCAL CGMU | -6.33%-5.06% | -6.78%-5.69% | -6.78%-5.69% | -13.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | FCAL CGMU | 88d92d | 102d228d | 102d228d | 1610dn/a |
FCAL | CGMU | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.95 | $26.36 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $46.89 | $26.35 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
FCAL | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.95 | $26.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.13% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $211.15 M | $7.19 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.27% |
FCAL | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | 639 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 20, 2017 | October 25, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15