FCAvsKUREETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.18%
First Trust China AlphaDEX ETF (FCA) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. FCA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. In contrast, KURE's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Non-Energy Materials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. FCA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.79% for KURE. FCA is down -11.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$25M in YTD flows. KURE performs better with 1.46% YTD performance, and +$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FCA and KURE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FCA vs KURE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCA KURE | -7.40%-6.15% | -8.79%+0.93% | -11.69%+1.46% | -12.22%-7.21% | +47.62%+2.96% | +5.94%-40.16% |
| Flows | FCA KURE | -+$5M | -$1M+$8M | -$25M+$29M | -$25M+$16M | +$13M+$39M | +$16M-$12M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FCA KURE | +15.98%+28.93% | +21.26%+28.10% | +22.65%+26.90% | +22.83%+27.57% |
| Max drawdown | FCA KURE | -14.17%-10.67% | -28.57%-24.36% | -28.57%-31.17% | -35.48%-58.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | FCA KURE | 79d21d | 168d259d | 168d619d | 1306d1801d |
Trading data
FCA | KURE | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.72 | $17.80 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $23.72 | $17.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FCA | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FCA | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.72 | $17.80 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | +0.68% |
| AuM | $27.43 M | $107.05 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
FCA | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index | MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 18, 2011 | January 31, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FCA
China
83.78%
Other
16.22%
KURE
China
83.71%
Switzerland
8.84%
Other
7.45%
Sectors
FCA
Finance
21.06%
Technology
14.17%
Energy
12.36%
Industrials
11.43%
Healthcare
10.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.69%
Other
22.86%
KURE
Healthcare
98.28%
Other
1.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
FCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.24%
KURE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FCA
Lenovo Group Ltd.
4.25%
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co. Ltd.
4.25%
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.
3.89%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
3.85%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
3.62%
Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd.
3.28%
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
3.12%
3SBio, Inc.
3.04%
Weichai Power Co., Ltd.
2.97%
China Hongqiao Group Ltd.
2.96%
China Reinsurance (Group) Corp.
2.94%
AAC Technologies Holdings, Inc.
2.64%
Anhui Conch Cement Co., Ltd.
2.57%
BYD Electronic (International) Co., Ltd.
2.46%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
2.40%
KURE
Innovent Biologics, Inc.
9.50%
BeOne Medicines Ltd.
8.84%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
7.35%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
5.60%
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.68%
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
4.55%
Akeso, Inc.
4.05%
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
3.69%
CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.
3.63%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
3.10%
Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
3.08%
Genscript Biotech Corp.
2.86%
Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd.
2.20%
3SBio, Inc.
2.15%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
2.15%
Frequently asked questions about FCA and KURE
How have the FCA and KURE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, FCA is down -11.69% year-to-date (YTD), while KURE has returned 1.46%. That puts KURE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FCA or KURE?
Year-to-date, the FCA ETF saw -$25M in flows, compared to +$29M for KURE.
Which ETF is more volatile: FCA or KURE?
Over the past year, FCA had a volatility of 21.26%, while KURE experienced 28.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: FCA or KURE?
As of October 28, 2026, FCA holds $27.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while KURE manages $107.05 M.
What sectors do the FCA and KURE ETFs invest in?
FCA leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Energy. Meanwhile, KURE focuses on Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FCA ETF and KURE ETF?
FCA top holdings include Lenovo Group Ltd., COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co. Ltd. and ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.. KURE holds in its top three: Innovent Biologics, Inc., BeOne Medicines Ltd. and WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FCA or KURE?
FCA holds 43 securities with 48.24% of its assets in the top 15. KURE has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 67.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
