Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
FBUFvsVVETF Comparison
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is part of the US Large Cap segment. FBUF's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. In contrast, VV's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. FBUF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.03% for VV. FBUF is up 0.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. VV performs worse with -1.07% YTD performance, and +$301M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FBUF and VV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
FBUF vs VV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FBUF VV | -1.17%-2.13% | +0.43%-1.66% | +0.21%-1.07% | +17.29%+22.31% | n/a+84.24% | n/a+82.97% |
| Flows | FBUF VV | +$794K+$261M | +$3M+$440M | +$2M+$301M | +$7M+$87M | -+$3.10B | -+$6.60B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FBUF VV | +7.92%+11.57% | +10.59%+18.30% | n/a+14.83% | n/a+17.15% |
| Max drawdown | FBUF VV | -1.84%-3.47% | -7.83%-13.87% | n/a-19.01% | n/a-25.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | FBUF VV | 36d57d | 59d45d | n/a126d | n/a715d |
FBUF | VV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.91 | $311.15 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $30.88 | $311.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
FBUF | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
FBUF | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.91 | $311.15 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $19.31 M | $47.03 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the FBUF and VV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, FBUF is up 0.21% year-to-date (YTD), while VV has lost -1.07%. That puts FBUF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FBUF or VV?
Year-to-date, the FBUF ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$301M for VV.
Which ETF is more volatile: FBUF or VV?
Over the past year, FBUF had a volatility of 10.59%, while VV experienced 18.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: FBUF or VV?
As of March 10, 2026, FBUF holds $19.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while VV manages $47.03 B.
What sectors do the FBUF and VV ETFs invest in?
FBUF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, VV focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the FBUF ETF and VV ETF?
FBUF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. VV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: FBUF or VV?
FBUF holds 146 securities with 47.44% of its assets in the top 15. VV has 442 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.34%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
