FBLvsQLDETF Comparison
VS
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) belong to the same industry segment: Leveraged Equity. FBL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.09%, versus 0.98% for QLD. FBL is down -27.57% year-to-date (YTD) with -$200M in YTD flows. QLD performs better with 28.32% YTD performance, and +$1.09B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FBL and QLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FBL vs QLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FBL QLD | -23.98%-4.80% | +4.20%+9.49% | -27.57%+28.32% | -46.38%+21.13% | +106.19%+232.41% | n/a+122.63% |
| Flows | FBL QLD | +$26M+$430M | -$44M+$966M | -$200M+$1.09B | +$13M+$1.56B | +$114M+$1.82B | -+$1.97B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FBL QLD | +95.21%+38.02% | +87.18%+39.88% | +77.23%+41.07% | n/a+46.42% |
| Max drawdown | FBL QLD | -35.94%-14.47% | -58.03%-25.08% | -63.12%-42.40% | n/a-63.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | FBL QLD | 32d21d | 362d169d | 616d212d | n/a878d |
Trading data
FBL | QLD | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.25 | $91.39 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $22.79 | $90.29 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FBL | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FBL | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.25 | $91.39 |
| 1D performance | -2.37% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $137.00 M | $14.62 B |
| E/R | 1.09% | 0.98% |
Characteristics
FBL | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | GraniteShares | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Meta | NASDAQ-100 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2022 | June 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Exposure data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about FBL and QLD
How have the FBL and QLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, FBL is down -27.57% year-to-date (YTD), while QLD has returned 28.32%. That puts QLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FBL or QLD?
Year-to-date, the FBL ETF saw -$200M in flows, compared to +$1.09B for QLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: FBL or QLD?
Over the past year, FBL had a volatility of 87.18%, while QLD experienced 39.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: FBL or QLD?
As of October 26, 2026, FBL holds $137.00 M in assets under management (AUM), while QLD manages $14.62 B.
Latest news about FBL & QLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
