FADvsISCGETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FAD) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) is part of the US Small Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. FAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.63%, versus 0.06% for ISCG. FAD is up 9.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$190M in YTD flows. ISCG performs better with 10.68% YTD performance, and +$67M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FAD and ISCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FAD vs ISCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FAD ISCG | -2.45%-1.70% | -3.73%-3.91% | +9.26%+10.68% | +8.64%+11.48% | +90.42%+69.44% | +40.95%+20.10% |
| Flows | FAD ISCG | +$9M+$6M | +$36M+$12M | +$190M+$67M | +$206M+$98M | +$290M+$262M | +$245M+$305M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FAD ISCG | +17.95%+15.17% | +20.91%+18.33% | +20.06%+20.24% | +21.50%+22.93% |
| Max drawdown | FAD ISCG | -9.76%-9.76% | -12.44%-11.43% | -23.51%-26.39% | -31.99%-37.91% |
| Max drawdown duration | FAD ISCG | 74d78d | 122d84d | 230d275d | 967d1096d |
Trading data
FAD | ISCG | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $175.06 | $61.13 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $176.89 | $61.28 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FAD | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
FAD | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $175.06 | $61.13 |
| 1D performance | -1.03% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $591.67 M | $960.13 M |
| E/R | 0.63% | 0.06% |
Characteristics
FAD | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index | Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index |
| N° of holdings | 669 | 912 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FAD
USA
96.73%
Other
3.27%
ISCG
USA
98.38%
Other
1.62%
Sectors
FAD
Technology
26.65%
Industrials
19.45%
Healthcare
17.55%
Finance
13.85%
Other
22.5%
ISCG
Technology
23.25%
Industrials
18.59%
Healthcare
18.12%
Finance
15.48%
Other
24.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
FAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.14%
ISCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
FAD
Everpure, Inc.
0.66%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
0.61%
Illumina, Inc.
0.59%
Natera, Inc.
0.59%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.59%
Fortinet, Inc.
0.57%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.54%
Datadog, Inc.
0.52%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.52%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.52%
Incyte Corp.
0.50%
Analog Devices, Inc.
0.50%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
0.48%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.48%
Amphenol Corp.
0.47%
ISCG
Okta, Inc.
1.17%
Atlassian Corp.
0.95%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.76%
Roku, Inc.
0.66%
Nutanix, Inc.
0.62%
Rubrik, Inc.
0.58%
Dynatrace, Inc.
0.56%
Semtech Corp.
0.55%
Nordson Corp.
0.55%
Onto Innovation, Inc.
0.51%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.50%
SiTime Corp.
0.49%
Unity Software, Inc.
0.48%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
0.48%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
0.48%
Frequently asked questions about FAD and ISCG
How have the FAD and ISCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, FAD is up 9.26% year-to-date (YTD), while ISCG has returned 10.68%. That puts ISCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FAD or ISCG?
Year-to-date, the FAD ETF saw +$190M in flows, compared to +$67M for ISCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: FAD or ISCG?
Over the past year, FAD had a volatility of 20.91%, while ISCG experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: FAD or ISCG?
As of October 30, 2026, FAD holds $591.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while ISCG manages $960.13 M.
What sectors do the FAD and ISCG ETFs invest in?
FAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ISCG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the FAD ETF and ISCG ETF?
FAD top holdings include Everpure, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc. and Illumina, Inc.. ISCG holds in its top three: Okta, Inc., Atlassian Corp. and Guardant Health, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FAD or ISCG?
FAD holds 669 securities with 8.14% of its assets in the top 15. ISCG has 919 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.33%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
