FADvsFSGSETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FAD) and First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. FAD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, FSGS's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. FAD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.63%, versus 0.6% for FSGS. FAD is up 11.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$181M in YTD flows. FSGS performs worse with 6.91% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FAD and FSGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FAD vs FSGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FAD FSGS | -6.82%-4.00% | -5.59%+5.76% | +11.82%+6.91% | +13.86%+3.87% | +77.02%+29.68% | +50.17%+24.95% |
| Flows | FAD FSGS | +$27M- | +$85M+$2M | +$181M+$2M | +$206M+$107K | +$276M-$3M | +$236M+$11M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FAD FSGS | +19.79%+13.14% | +20.81%+14.74% | +20.05%+18.70% | +21.47%+19.94% |
| Max drawdown | FAD FSGS | -10.71%-4.80% | -10.71%-11.35% | -23.51%-23.71% | -31.99%-23.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | FAD FSGS | 79d35d | 79d160d | 230d585d | 967d585d |
Trading data
FAD | FSGS | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $181.17 | $32.37 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $180.88 | $32.55 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FAD | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FAD | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $181.17 | $32.37 |
| 1D performance | +0.16% | -0.57% |
| AuM | $596.67 M | $30.90 M |
| E/R | 0.63% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
FAD | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | First Trust |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index | The SMID Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 666 | 99 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | June 20, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FAD
USA
96.26%
Other
3.74%
FSGS
USA
96.74%
Other
3.26%
Sectors
FAD
Technology
23.83%
Industrials
20.02%
Healthcare
17.73%
Finance
14.43%
Other
23.99%
FSGS
Finance
29.35%
Healthcare
19.13%
Technology
15.82%
Industrials
12.85%
Other
22.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
FAD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.04%
FSGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
FAD
Everpure, Inc.
0.53%
Incyte Corp.
0.53%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.49%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.49%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
0.48%
Morgan Stanley
0.47%
Fortinet, Inc.
0.47%
United Rentals, Inc.
0.46%
Illumina, Inc.
0.46%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.45%
Natera, Inc.
0.45%
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.44%
Analog Devices, Inc.
0.44%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
0.44%
eBay, Inc.
0.44%
FSGS
Elastic NV
1.33%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.30%
InterDigital, Inc.
1.25%
UiPath, Inc.
1.25%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
1.23%
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
1.23%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
1.22%
Tidewater, Inc.
1.21%
Cactus, Inc.
1.20%
Oceaneering International, Inc.
1.18%
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
1.18%
PTC, Inc.
1.17%
AppFolio, Inc.
1.16%
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
1.15%
Doximity, Inc.
1.15%
Frequently asked questions about FAD and FSGS
How have the FAD and FSGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, FAD is up 11.82% year-to-date (YTD), while FSGS has returned 6.91%. That puts FAD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FAD or FSGS?
Year-to-date, the FAD ETF saw +$181M in flows, compared to +$2M for FSGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: FAD or FSGS?
Over the past year, FAD had a volatility of 20.81%, while FSGS experienced 14.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: FAD or FSGS?
As of September 17, 2026, FAD holds $596.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSGS manages $30.90 M.
What sectors do the FAD and FSGS ETFs invest in?
FAD leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FSGS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the FAD ETF and FSGS ETF?
FAD top holdings include Everpure, Inc., Incyte Corp. and Lumentum Holdings, Inc.. FSGS holds in its top three: Elastic NV, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. and InterDigital, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FAD or FSGS?
FAD holds 666 securities with 7.04% of its assets in the top 15. FSGS has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.21%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
