FABvsXMVMETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FAB) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. FAB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.37% for XMVM. FAB is up 19.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. XMVM performs worse with 16.83% YTD performance, and +$115M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FAB and XMVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
FAB vs XMVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FAB XMVM | +5.36%+4.30% | +0.63%-0.28% | +19.58%+16.83% | +22.61%+24.75% | +67.10%+80.72% | +56.24%+71.28% |
| Flows | FAB XMVM | -$5M+$5M | -$5M+$28M | +$20M+$115M | +$16M+$133M | -$52M+$201M | -$25M+$215M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | FAB XMVM | +11.39%+11.12% | +12.37%+13.06% | +16.58%+18.07% | +18.79%+20.84% |
| Max drawdown | FAB XMVM | -8.34%-7.53% | -8.34%-9.19% | -22.74%-23.80% | -22.74%-23.80% |
| Max drawdown duration | FAB XMVM | 71d71d | 71d80d | 366d274d | 366d274d |
Trading data
FAB | XMVM | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $104.89 | $73.58 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $105.21 | $73.76 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FAB | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FAB | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $104.89 | $73.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $163.09 M | $526.00 M |
| E/R | 0.66% | 0.37% |
Characteristics
FAB | XMVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index | S&P 400 High Momentum Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 668 | 79 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2007 | March 3, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
FAB
USA
94.1%
Other
5.9%
XMVM
USA
97.23%
Other
2.77%
Sectors
FAB
Finance
29.23%
Energy
13.57%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.4%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.53%
Utilities
7.1%
Other
33.17%
XMVM
Finance
40.96%
Energy
17.85%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.41%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
23.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
FAB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.96%
XMVM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
FAB
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.
0.70%
Accenture Plc
0.65%
ConocoPhillips
0.56%
AT&T, Inc.
0.54%
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
0.54%
Global Payments, Inc.
0.53%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.52%
Phillips 66
0.51%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.51%
General Mills, Inc.
0.50%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.49%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
0.49%
Valero Energy Corp.
0.48%
Expand Energy Corp.
0.47%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.47%
XMVM
PBF Energy, Inc.
3.93%
HF Sinclair Corp.
2.40%
Macy's, Inc.
2.24%
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
2.10%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
2.04%
AutoNation, Inc.
1.92%
Avnet, Inc.
1.85%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
1.85%
Greif, Inc.
1.79%
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.
1.75%
CNX Resources Corp.
1.71%
First American Financial Corp.
1.69%
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
1.69%
Lear Corp.
1.65%
Associated Banc-Corp
1.58%
Frequently asked questions about FAB and XMVM
How have the FAB and XMVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, FAB is up 19.58% year-to-date (YTD), while XMVM has returned 16.83%. That puts FAB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FAB or XMVM?
Year-to-date, the FAB ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to +$115M for XMVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: FAB or XMVM?
Over the past year, FAB had a volatility of 12.37%, while XMVM experienced 13.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: FAB or XMVM?
As of October 26, 2026, FAB holds $163.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMVM manages $526.00 M.
What sectors do the FAB and XMVM ETFs invest in?
FAB leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, XMVM focuses on Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the FAB ETF and XMVM ETF?
FAB top holdings include Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Accenture Plc and ConocoPhillips. XMVM holds in its top three: PBF Energy, Inc., HF Sinclair Corp. and Macy's, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FAB or XMVM?
FAB holds 668 securities with 7.96% of its assets in the top 15. XMVM has 79 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.18%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
