Ready-made ETF portfolios built for real investor needs. Explore now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

FABvsIMCVETF Comparison

ETF 1
FAB

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.71%
VS
ETF 2
IMCV

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

This fund is part of
US Mid Cap Value
-0.68%

First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund ETF (FAB) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. FAB's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, IMCV's top sector exposures are Finance, Energy and Healthcare. FAB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.06% for IMCV. FAB is up 18.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$25M in YTD flows. IMCV performs worse with 17.09% YTD performance, and +$100M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of FAB and IMCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

FAB vs IMCV performance and flow charts

Performance

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Cumulative Flows

-5 M0 M5 M10 M15 M20 MAug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/09/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
FAB
IMCV
-1.61%-1.54%
+5.10%+6.75%
+18.65%+17.09%
+22.48%+22.65%
+55.19%+62.57%
+60.81%+67.50%
Flows
FAB
IMCV
-$5M+$20M
+$21M+$38M
+$25M+$100M
+$21M+$147M
-$51M+$306M
-$24M+$380M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
FAB
IMCV
+11.60%+10.32%
+12.61%+11.36%
+16.70%+14.16%
+18.83%+16.39%
Max drawdown
FAB
IMCV
-2.94%-3.04%
-6.70%-7.02%
-22.74%-18.64%
-22.74%-19.72%
Max drawdown duration
FAB
IMCV
24d17d
53d62d
366d269d
366d602d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
FAB
IMCV
Last sale
9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
$105.12
$96.19
Previous close
09/10/2026
$104.45
$95.48
Consolidated volume
09/10/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
FAB
IMCV
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
FAB
IMCV
Last price
$105.12
$96.19
1D performance
+0.64%
+0.74%
AuM$167.94 M$1.16 B
E/R0.66%0.06%
Characteristics
FAB
IMCV
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderFirst TrustiShares
BenchmarkNASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value IndexMorningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index
N° of holdings667267
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateMay 8, 2007June 28, 2004
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

FAB
USA
93.96%
Other
6.04%
IMCV
USA
97.05%
Other
2.95%

Sectors

FAB
Finance
29.47%
Energy
12.99%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.54%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.45%
Utilities
7.31%
Other
33.24%
IMCV
Finance
24.99%
Energy
11.79%
Healthcare
10.37%
Industrials
9.83%
Utilities
9.42%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.66%
Other
24.94%
Advertisement

Diversification

FAB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

7.88%
IMCV

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

17.71%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
FAB
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.
0.67%
Accenture Plc
0.62%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.61%
ConocoPhillips
0.55%
Global Payments, Inc.
0.54%
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
0.53%
AT&T, Inc.
0.51%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.50%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
0.49%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.49%
Phillips 66
0.48%
General Mills, Inc.
0.48%
General Motors Co.
0.47%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.47%
The Walt Disney Co.
0.47%
IMCV
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
1.48%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
1.40%
U.S. Bancorp
1.36%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.29%
3M Co.
1.28%
Phillips 66
1.18%
Mondelez International, Inc.
1.14%
General Motors Co.
1.11%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
1.11%
Elevance Health, Inc.
1.10%
United Parcel Service, Inc.
1.10%
EOG Resources, Inc.
1.08%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.04%
The Cigna Group
1.02%
SLB Ltd.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about FAB and IMCV

How have the FAB and IMCV ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 9, 2026, FAB is up 18.65% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCV has returned 17.09%. That puts FAB better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: FAB or IMCV?

Year-to-date, the FAB ETF saw +$25M in flows, compared to +$100M for IMCV.

Which ETF is more volatile: FAB or IMCV?

Over the past year, FAB had a volatility of 12.61%, while IMCV experienced 11.36%.

Which ETF is bigger: FAB or IMCV?

As of September 9, 2026, FAB holds $167.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCV manages $1.16 B.

What sectors do the FAB and IMCV ETFs invest in?

FAB leans toward sectors like Finance, Energy and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, IMCV focuses on Finance, Energy and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the FAB ETF and IMCV ETF?

FAB top holdings include Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Accenture Plc and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. IMCV holds in its top three: Automatic Data Processing, Inc., The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp.

Which ETF is more diversified: FAB or IMCV?

FAB holds 667 securities with 7.88% of its assets in the top 15. IMCV has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.71%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up