Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EWWvsFLLAETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) belong to the same industry segment: LatAm Blended Cap. EWW's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Consumer Staples and Financials. In contrast, FLLA's top sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Consumer Staples. EWW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.19% for FLLA. EWW is up 3.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$220M in YTD flows. FLLA performs better with 9.6% YTD performance, and +$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWW and FLLA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EWW vs FLLA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWW FLLA | -11.75%-7.68% | +3.32%+8.54% | +3.24%+9.60% | +45.08%+49.44% | +41.89%+59.61% | +91.41%+68.67% |
| Flows | EWW FLLA | +$41M+$9M | +$191M+$30M | +$220M+$28M | +$106M+$36M | +$560M+$2M | +$367M+$60M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWW FLLA | +27.08%+26.03% | +23.02%+20.33% | +22.51%+19.15% | +21.45%+21.13% |
| Max drawdown | EWW FLLA | -11.86%-9.96% | -11.86%-11.18% | -31.18%-27.38% | -31.18%-28.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWW FLLA | 19d16d | 19d19d | 522d623d | 522d436d |
EWW | FLLA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.53 | $26.35 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $72.17 | $26.84 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EWW | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EWW | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.53 | $26.35 |
| 1D performance | -0.89% | -1.83% |
| AuM | $2.15 B | $76.53 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.19% |
EWW | FLLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index | FTSE Latin America Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 117 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | October 9, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EWW and FLLA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, EWW is up 3.24% year-to-date (YTD), while FLLA has returned 9.6%. That puts FLLA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWW or FLLA?
Year-to-date, the EWW ETF saw +$220M in flows, compared to +$28M for FLLA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWW or FLLA?
Over the past year, EWW had a volatility of 23.02%, while FLLA experienced 20.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWW or FLLA?
As of March 13, 2026, EWW holds $2.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLLA manages $76.53 M.
What sectors do the EWW and FLLA ETFs invest in?
EWW leans toward sectors like Materials, Consumer Staples and Financials. Meanwhile, FLLA focuses on Financials, Materials and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the EWW ETF and FLLA ETF?
EWW top holdings include GRUPO MEXICO, GRUPO FINANCE BANORTE and MX01AM050019. FLLA holds in its top three: VALE SA, ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING PRF and GRUPO FINANCE BANORTE.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWW or FLLA?
EWW holds 40 securities with 74% of its assets in the top 15. FLLA has 131 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.39%.
The ETF Underdogs: 5 ETFs Under $50 Million AUM to Watch
Tony's ETF Buyer's Guide: Latin America ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
