EWMvsFNDEETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
This fund is part of
EM Large & Mid Cap
-1.26%
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. EWM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FNDE's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. EWM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.39% for FNDE. EWM is down -1.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$51M in YTD flows. FNDE performs better with 18.62% YTD performance, and +$741M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWM and FNDE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EWM vs FNDE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWM FNDE | -3.90%+1.54% | -5.21%+5.10% | -1.04%+18.62% | +7.47%+22.62% | +42.68%+86.21% | +19.99%+67.90% |
| Flows | EWM FNDE | -$70M-$9M | -$59M+$471M | -$51M+$741M | -$27M+$1.10B | -$46M+$1.91B | -$3M+$2.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWM FNDE | +10.23%+11.14% | +11.95%+13.53% | +11.92%+14.23% | +12.04%+14.87% |
| Max drawdown | EWM FNDE | -8.25%-2.87% | -11.12%-9.42% | -20.22%-15.44% | -22.11%-29.29% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWM FNDE | 51d37d | 162d68d | 371d245d | 1023d824d |
Trading data
EWM | FNDE | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.28 | $42.28 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $26.51 | $42.44 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EWM | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EWM | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.28 | $42.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.87% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $235.30 M | $10.45 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
EWM | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Daily Malaysia Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 291 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EWM
Malaysia
98.02%
Other
1.98%
FNDE
China
30.6%
Taiwan
19.63%
Brazil
12.91%
India
9.84%
Other
27.02%
Sectors
EWM
Finance
53.81%
Utilities
10.49%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.35%
Other
26.35%
FNDE
Finance
28.37%
Technology
19.44%
Energy
14.82%
Non-Energy Materi.
13.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.53%
Other
16.15%
Advertisement
Diversification
EWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.8%
FNDE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EWM
Public Bank Bhd.
15.60%
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd.
13.50%
Malayan Banking Bhd.
11.18%
Tenaga Nasional Bhd.
6.69%
Press Metal Aluminium Holdings Bhd.
4.88%
Gamuda Bhd.
4.80%
YTL Power International Bhd.
3.80%
AMMB Holdings Bhd.
3.71%
Rhb Bank Bhd.
3.49%
SD Guthrie Bhd
3.33%
Hong Leong Bank Bhd.
3.31%
IHH Healthcare Bhd.
3.08%
Sunway Bhd.
3.02%
Petronas Gas Bhd.
3.02%
IOI Corp. Bhd.
2.39%
FNDE
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.81%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
3.01%
Vale SA
2.85%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.74%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.73%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.49%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.34%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.95%
JD.com, Inc.
1.70%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.69%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.41%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.20%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
1.12%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.12%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about EWM and FNDE
How have the EWM and FNDE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EWM is down -1.04% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDE has returned 18.62%. That puts FNDE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWM or FNDE?
Year-to-date, the EWM ETF saw -$51M in flows, compared to +$741M for FNDE.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWM or FNDE?
Over the past year, EWM had a volatility of 11.95%, while FNDE experienced 13.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWM or FNDE?
As of October 16, 2026, EWM holds $235.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDE manages $10.45 B.
What sectors do the EWM and FNDE ETFs invest in?
EWM leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FNDE focuses on Finance, Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the EWM ETF and FNDE ETF?
EWM top holdings include Public Bank Bhd., CIMB Group Holdings Bhd. and Malayan Banking Bhd.. FNDE holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Vale SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWM or FNDE?
EWM holds 22 securities with 85.8% of its assets in the top 15. FNDE has 329 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.18%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
