EWMvsFLTWETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. EWM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FLTW's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. EWM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.19% for FLTW. EWM is down -1.04% year-to-date (YTD) with -$51M in YTD flows. FLTW performs better with 71.45% YTD performance, and +$3.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWM and FLTW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EWM vs FLTW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWM FLTW | -3.90%+0.60% | -5.21%+5.71% | -1.04%+71.45% | +7.47%+76.37% | +42.68%+202.60% | +19.99%+177.04% |
| Flows | EWM FLTW | -$70M+$1.04B | -$59M+$1.76B | -$51M+$3.33B | -$27M+$3.30B | -$46M+$3.56B | -$3M+$3.70B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWM FLTW | +10.23%+36.34% | +11.95%+32.24% | +11.92%+26.05% | +12.04%+23.60% |
| Max drawdown | EWM FLTW | -8.25%-13.19% | -11.12%-20.06% | -20.22%-24.68% | -22.11%-38.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWM FLTW | 51d22d | 162d73d | 371d334d | 1023d859d |
Trading data
EWM | FLTW | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.28 | $102.98 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $26.51 | $102.01 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EWM | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EWM | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.28 | $102.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.87% | +0.95% |
| AuM | $235.30 M | $4.90 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EWM | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Daily Malaysia Index | FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 128 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EWM
Malaysia
98.02%
Other
1.98%
FLTW
Taiwan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
EWM
Finance
53.81%
Utilities
10.49%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.35%
Other
26.35%
FLTW
Technology
72.2%
Finance
13.5%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.35%
Other
6.95%
Advertisement
Diversification
EWM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.8%
FLTW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EWM
Public Bank Bhd.
15.60%
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd.
13.50%
Malayan Banking Bhd.
11.18%
Tenaga Nasional Bhd.
6.69%
Press Metal Aluminium Holdings Bhd.
4.88%
Gamuda Bhd.
4.80%
YTL Power International Bhd.
3.80%
AMMB Holdings Bhd.
3.71%
Rhb Bank Bhd.
3.49%
SD Guthrie Bhd
3.33%
Hong Leong Bank Bhd.
3.31%
IHH Healthcare Bhd.
3.08%
Sunway Bhd.
3.02%
Petronas Gas Bhd.
3.02%
IOI Corp. Bhd.
2.39%
FLTW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
20.87%
MediaTek, Inc.
8.91%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
5.19%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
4.61%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
3.00%
Elite Material Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Unimicron Technology Corp.
2.35%
United Microelectronics Corp.
2.21%
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd.
1.77%
CTBC Financial Holding Co., Ltd.
1.74%
Nan Ya Plastics Corp.
1.56%
Accton Technology Corp.
1.56%
Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd.
1.55%
Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.50%
Quanta Computer, Inc.
1.35%
Frequently asked questions about EWM and FLTW
How have the EWM and FLTW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EWM is down -1.04% year-to-date (YTD), while FLTW has returned 71.45%. That puts FLTW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWM or FLTW?
Year-to-date, the EWM ETF saw -$51M in flows, compared to +$3.33B for FLTW.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWM or FLTW?
Over the past year, EWM had a volatility of 11.95%, while FLTW experienced 32.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWM or FLTW?
As of October 16, 2026, EWM holds $235.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLTW manages $4.90 B.
What sectors do the EWM and FLTW ETFs invest in?
EWM leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, FLTW focuses on Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EWM ETF and FLTW ETF?
EWM top holdings include Public Bank Bhd., CIMB Group Holdings Bhd. and Malayan Banking Bhd.. FLTW holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., MediaTek, Inc. and Delta Electronics, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: EWM or FLTW?
EWM holds 22 securities with 85.8% of its assets in the top 15. FLTW has 128 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.8%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
