EWLvsFLSWETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) belong to the same industry segment: Europe Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Healthcare, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. EWL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.09% for FLSW. EWL is up 7% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.26B in YTD flows. FLSW performs worse with 6.17% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWL and FLSW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EWL vs FLSW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/20/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWL FLSW | +3.59%+3.15% | +1.00%+0.20% | +7.00%+6.17% | +11.20%+11.19% | +57.54%+58.85% | +41.93%+43.38% |
| Flows | EWL FLSW | +$443M+$8M | +$742M+$8M | +$1.26B+$26M | +$1.36B+$26M | +$1.23B+$29M | +$979M+$35M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWL FLSW | +14.27%+13.01% | +15.66%+15.23% | +14.83%+14.84% | +16.01%+16.22% |
| Max drawdown | EWL FLSW | -9.06%-9.18% | -13.49%-13.22% | -13.56%-13.22% | -28.82%-28.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWL FLSW | 56d71d | 156d156d | 185d156d | 925d889d |
Trading data
EWL | FLSW | |
Last sale 10/21/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.16 | $43.48 |
| Previous close 10/20/2026 | $63.04 | $43.37 |
| Consolidated volume 10/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EWL | FLSW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/21/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EWL | FLSW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.16 | $43.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $2.91 B | $90.89 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
EWL | FLSW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI Switzerland 25/50 Index | FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | February 6, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EWL
Switzerland
98.94%
Other
1.06%
FLSW
Switzerland
98.71%
Other
1.29%
Sectors
EWL
Healthcare
37.06%
Finance
21.29%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.69%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.83%
Industrials
7.73%
Other
11.4%
FLSW
Healthcare
39.48%
Finance
18.6%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.54%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.95%
Industrials
9.71%
Other
8.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
EWL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.99%
FLSW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.64%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EWL
Roche Holding AG
13.64%
Novartis AG
12.35%
Nestlé SA
11.06%
UBS Group AG
6.84%
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA
4.65%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
4.53%
ABB Ltd.
4.41%
Swiss Re AG
2.82%
Lonza Group AG
2.75%
Holcim Ltd.
2.45%
Galderma Group AG
2.18%
Givaudan SA
2.14%
Sika AG
2.13%
Alcon AG
2.06%
Sandoz Group AG
1.99%
FLSW
Roche Holding AG
14.71%
Novartis AG
13.48%
Nestlé SA
11.68%
ABB Ltd.
7.04%
UBS Group AG
4.82%
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA
3.97%
Zurich Insurance Group AG
3.70%
Swiss Re AG
2.87%
Lonza Group AG
2.84%
Holcim Ltd.
2.49%
Galderma Group AG
2.18%
Sika AG
2.13%
Sandoz Group AG
2.02%
Alcon AG
1.96%
Swiss Life Holding AG
1.75%
Frequently asked questions about EWL and FLSW
How have the EWL and FLSW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 20, 2026, EWL is up 7% year-to-date (YTD), while FLSW has returned 6.17%. That puts EWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWL or FLSW?
Year-to-date, the EWL ETF saw +$1.26B in flows, compared to +$26M for FLSW.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWL or FLSW?
Over the past year, EWL had a volatility of 15.66%, while FLSW experienced 15.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWL or FLSW?
As of October 20, 2026, EWL holds $2.91 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLSW manages $90.89 M.
What sectors do the EWL and FLSW ETFs invest in?
EWL leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FLSW focuses on Healthcare, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the EWL ETF and FLSW ETF?
EWL top holdings include Roche Holding AG, Novartis AG and Nestlé SA. FLSW holds in its top three: Roche Holding AG, Novartis AG and Nestlé SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWL or FLSW?
EWL holds 41 securities with 75.99% of its assets in the top 15. FLSW has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.64%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EWL & FLSW
Advertisement
