Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EWJvsGSJYETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. EWJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.25% for GSJY. EWJ is up 6.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3.07B in YTD flows. GSJY performs better with 6.51% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWJ and GSJY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EWJ vs GSJY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWJ GSJY | -8.69%-7.80% | +5.62%+6.89% | +6.27%+6.51% | +31.08%+29.14% | +65.21%+64.35% | +42.06%+45.88% |
| Flows | EWJ GSJY | +$2.66B- | +$3.37B+$10M | +$3.07B+$10M | +$2.52B+$26M | +$4.16B+$49M | +$2.46B+$41M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWJ GSJY | +21.47%+24.27% | +21.38%+24.16% | +18.50%+21.46% | +18.07%+20.24% |
| Max drawdown | EWJ GSJY | -9.86%-11.62% | -14.78%-17.99% | -15.70%-18.92% | -33.16%-33.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWJ GSJY | 28d26d | 37d46d | 225d235d | 902d903d |
EWJ | GSJY | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:50 PM | $84.77 | $49.24 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $85.73 | $49.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EWJ | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EWJ | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.77 | $49.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $19.47 B | $79.14 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.25% |
EWJ | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 168 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | March 2, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EWJ and GSJY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EWJ is up 6.27% year-to-date (YTD), while GSJY has returned 6.51%. That puts GSJY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWJ or GSJY?
Year-to-date, the EWJ ETF saw +$3.07B in flows, compared to +$10M for GSJY.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWJ or GSJY?
Over the past year, EWJ had a volatility of 21.38%, while GSJY experienced 24.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWJ or GSJY?
As of March 11, 2026, EWJ holds $19.47 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSJY manages $79.14 M.
What sectors do the EWJ and GSJY ETFs invest in?
EWJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSJY focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EWJ ETF and GSJY ETF?
EWJ top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. GSJY holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWJ or GSJY?
EWJ holds 182 securities with 37.21% of its assets in the top 15. GSJY has 168 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.32%.
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
Japan Stocks Outperform Amid Controlled Inflation and Accommodating Monetary Policy
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.