Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EWJvsDBJPETF Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. EWJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.45% for DBJP. EWJ is up 7.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.84B in YTD flows. DBJP performs better with 7.81% YTD performance, and +$120M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWJ and DBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EWJ vs DBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWJ DBJP | -6.64%-5.33% | +6.86%+8.61% | +7.31%+7.81% | +31.62%+42.40% | +65.88%+116.81% | +43.87%+143.93% |
| Flows | EWJ DBJP | +$2.43B+$27M | +$3.13B+$120M | +$2.84B+$120M | +$2.29B+$64M | +$3.93B+$104M | +$2.23B+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWJ DBJP | +21.35%+23.04% | +21.36%+23.16% | +18.49%+21.48% | +18.06%+19.61% |
| Max drawdown | EWJ DBJP | -9.86%-9.16% | -14.78%-18.53% | -15.70%-25.81% | -33.16%-25.81% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWJ DBJP | 27d9d | 37d63d | 225d350d | 902d350d |
EWJ | DBJP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $85.73 | $102.39 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $86.46 | $102.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EWJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EWJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $85.73 | $102.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.84% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $19.43 B | $590.26 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.45% |
EWJ | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EWJ and DBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, EWJ is up 7.31% year-to-date (YTD), while DBJP has returned 7.81%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWJ or DBJP?
Year-to-date, the EWJ ETF saw +$2.84B in flows, compared to +$120M for DBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWJ or DBJP?
Over the past year, EWJ had a volatility of 21.36%, while DBJP experienced 23.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWJ or DBJP?
As of March 10, 2026, EWJ holds $19.43 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBJP manages $590.26 M.
What sectors do the EWJ and DBJP ETFs invest in?
EWJ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, DBJP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the EWJ ETF and DBJP ETF?
EWJ top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. DBJP holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWJ or DBJP?
EWJ holds 182 securities with 37.21% of its assets in the top 15. DBJP has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.31%.
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.