Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EWHvsKBAETF Comparison
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. EWH's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Real Estate and Industrials. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Materials. EWH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.79% for KBA. EWH is up 6.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$112M in YTD flows. KBA performs worse with 0.06% YTD performance, and -$37M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWH and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EWH vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWH KBA | -1.93%-0.03% | +6.39%+2.48% | +6.63%+0.06% | +31.59%+31.46% | +27.67%+25.91% | +2.10%-1.14% |
| Flows | EWH KBA | +$73M-$6M | +$112M-$42M | +$112M-$37M | +$5M-$36M | -$91M-$268M | -$548M-$288M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWH KBA | +15.09%+13.70% | +17.14%+16.48% | +19.36%+18.20% | +18.90%+19.66% |
| Max drawdown | EWH KBA | -5.66%-5.50% | -16.81%-11.76% | -27.42%-26.79% | -42.70%-46.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWH KBA | 12d64d | 53d105d | 533d528d | 1702d1744d |
EWH | KBA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.76 | $30.32 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $22.88 | $30.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EWH | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EWH | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.76 | $30.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $807.08 M | $186.88 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.79% |
EWH | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI Hong Kong 25/50 Index | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EWH and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, EWH is up 6.63% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has returned 0.06%. That puts EWH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWH or KBA?
Year-to-date, the EWH ETF saw +$112M in flows, compared to -$37M for KBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWH or KBA?
Over the past year, EWH had a volatility of 17.14%, while KBA experienced 16.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWH or KBA?
As of March 13, 2026, EWH holds $807.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $186.88 M.
What sectors do the EWH and KBA ETFs invest in?
EWH leans toward sectors like Financials, Real Estate and Industrials. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EWH ETF and KBA ETF?
EWH top holdings include AIA, HONG KONG EXCHANGES AND CLEARING and CK HUTCHISON HLDGS LTD. KBA holds in its top three: ZIJIN MINING, AMPEREX TECH and MOUTAI.
Which ETF is more diversified: EWH or KBA?
EWH holds 27 securities with 83.91% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.38%.
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
