EWAvsBBAXETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.57%
iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. EWA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Healthcare. In contrast, BBAX's top sector exposures are Finance, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. EWA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.19% for BBAX. EWA is up 14.66% year-to-date (YTD) with -$111M in YTD flows. BBAX performs better with 16.17% YTD performance, and +$426M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EWA and BBAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EWA vs BBAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EWA BBAX | +1.04%+0.85% | +2.97%+5.11% | +14.66%+16.17% | +14.28%+18.37% | +47.87%+53.71% | +39.19%+38.68% |
| Flows | EWA BBAX | -$100M+$39M | -$153M+$166M | -$111M+$426M | -$332M+$603M | -$1.21B+$1.03B | -$315M+$1.91B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EWA BBAX | +16.70%+14.28% | +17.10%+14.18% | +18.78%+16.03% | +20.04%+16.99% |
| Max drawdown | EWA BBAX | -4.97%-4.70% | -9.96%-8.97% | -22.08%-19.95% | -24.92%-23.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | EWA BBAX | 55d41d | 48d152d | 252d240d | 702d871d |
Trading data
EWA | BBAX | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.03 | $65.05 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $29.68 | $64.28 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EWA | BBAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
EWA | BBAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.03 | $65.05 |
| 1D performance | +1.18% | +1.20% |
| AuM | $1.32 B | $6.82 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
EWA | BBAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI Australia Index | Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 91 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 12, 1996 | August 8, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EWA
Australia
99.22%
Other
0.78%
BBAX
Australia
64.7%
Hong Kong
16.92%
Singapore
15.69%
Other
2.69%
Sectors
EWA
Finance
46.69%
Non-Energy Materi.
23.35%
Other
29.96%
BBAX
Finance
53.68%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.81%
Other
30.51%
Advertisement
Diversification
EWA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.2%
BBAX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
60.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
EWA
BHP Group Ltd.
14.34%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
14.23%
Westpac Banking Corp.
6.22%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
6.08%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
5.39%
Wesfarmers Ltd.
4.83%
Macquarie Group Ltd.
4.32%
Rio Tinto Ltd.
2.99%
Woodside Energy Group Ltd.
2.98%
CSL Ltd.
2.96%
Goodman Group
2.78%
Woolworths Group Ltd.
2.36%
Transurban Group Ltd.
2.20%
QBE Insurance Group Ltd.
1.82%
Aristocrat Leisure Ltd.
1.69%
BBAX
BHP Group Ltd.
9.63%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
9.34%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
5.31%
AIA Group Ltd.
4.72%
Westpac Banking Corp.
4.07%
National Australia Bank Ltd.
3.95%
ANZ Group Holdings Ltd.
3.50%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
3.35%
Wesfarmers Ltd.
3.14%
Macquarie Group Ltd.
2.96%
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
2.76%
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Singapore)
2.00%
Rio Tinto Ltd.
1.92%
Woodside Energy Group Ltd.
1.88%
Goodman Group
1.81%
Frequently asked questions about EWA and BBAX
How have the EWA and BBAX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, EWA is up 14.66% year-to-date (YTD), while BBAX has returned 16.17%. That puts BBAX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EWA or BBAX?
Year-to-date, the EWA ETF saw -$111M in flows, compared to +$426M for BBAX.
Which ETF is more volatile: EWA or BBAX?
Over the past year, EWA had a volatility of 17.1%, while BBAX experienced 14.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: EWA or BBAX?
As of September 1, 2026, EWA holds $1.32 B in assets under management (AUM), while BBAX manages $6.82 B.
What sectors do the EWA and BBAX ETFs invest in?
EWA leans toward sectors like Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, BBAX focuses on Finance and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the EWA ETF and BBAX ETF?
EWA top holdings include BHP Group Ltd., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Westpac Banking Corp.. BBAX holds in its top three: BHP Group Ltd., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and DBS Group Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: EWA or BBAX?
EWA holds 48 securities with 75.2% of its assets in the top 15. BBAX has 92 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.34%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
