EVYMvsCMFETF Comparison
VS
Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Municipal and Non-Corporate. EVYM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.08% for CMF. EVYM is down -1.19% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. CMF performs worse with -2.36% YTD performance, and +$1.60B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EVYM and CMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
EVYM vs CMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EVYM CMF | -1.30%-0.25% | -4.94%-3.34% | -1.19%-2.36% | -0.30%-1.71% | n/a+9.17% | n/a+0.25% |
| Flows | EVYM CMF | -$932K+$660M | +$1M+$801M | +$12M+$1.60B | +$17M+$1.96B | -+$3.16B | -+$3.62B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EVYM CMF | +6.44%+4.84% | +4.00%+3.08% | n/a+3.57% | n/a+3.58% |
| Max drawdown | EVYM CMF | -7.12%-5.69% | -7.74%-6.52% | n/a-6.52% | n/a-12.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | EVYM CMF | 92d92d | 102d229d | n/a229d | n/a1346d |
Trading data
EVYM | CMF | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 3:55 PM | $47.44 | $54.81 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $47.53 | $54.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 19, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EVYM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexEVYM | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 3:55 PM
Live
Closed
EVYM | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.44 | $54.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $55.07 M | $5.19 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.08% |
Characteristics
EVYM | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Eaton Vance | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index |
| N° of holdings | 72 | 903 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 25, 2025 | October 4, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
EVYM
USA
64.2%
Other
35.8%
CMF
USA
59.23%
Other
40.77%
Sectors
EVYM
Municipal
64.02%
Other
35.98%
CMF
Municipal
59.23%
Other
40.77%
Advertisement
Diversification
EVYM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.21%
CMF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
EVYM
Mobile Industrial Development Authority, 4.75% 1dec2054, USD (2024B)
2.37%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2059, USD (2025)
1.79%
FW Texas Street Public Facility Corporation, 5% 1may2038, USD (2025)
1.78%
US939783Z415
1.77%
Vail Home Partners Corp., 6% 1oct2064, USD (2025)
1.75%
Atlanta Development Authority, 5.5% 1apr2039, USD (2024A-2)
1.73%
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, 5.5% 1sep2059, USD (2024)
1.73%
California Municipal Finance Authority, 6% 1nov2043, USD (2025B)
1.71%
Lakewood Ranch Stewardship District, 5.125% 1may2046, USD (2016)
1.70%
California Municipal Finance Authority, 5% 31dec2047, USD (2018A)
1.69%
Washington Housing Finance Commission, 4.5% 1jul2055, USD (2025)
1.53%
US51946PCK84
1.50%
Chicago Board of Education, 5.75% 1dec2050, USD (2025A)
1.44%
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., 5.5% 1oct2035, USD (2025A)
1.38%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2055, USD (2025)
1.35%
CMF
Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A)
0.60%
US79766DLC10
0.52%
US032556NJ70
0.49%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2031, USD (2024)
0.47%
University of California, 5.5% 15may2040, USD
0.46%
California Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1may2045, USD
0.44%
US4636324Q95
0.44%
US79905CAB90
0.42%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2034, USD (2024A)
0.41%
US13077DUT70
0.40%
University of California, 5% 15may2036, USD (2025)
0.39%
California, 5% 1mar2055, USD
0.37%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.34%
US91412GSH91
0.32%
East AWP Joint Powers Authority, 3.125% 1sep2026, USD (2024A)
0.32%
Frequently asked questions about EVYM and CMF
How have the EVYM and CMF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, EVYM is down -1.19% year-to-date (YTD), while CMF has lost -2.36%. That puts EVYM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EVYM or CMF?
Year-to-date, the EVYM ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$1.60B for CMF.
Which ETF is more volatile: EVYM or CMF?
Over the past year, EVYM had a volatility of 4%, while CMF experienced 3.08%.
Which ETF is bigger: EVYM or CMF?
As of October 16, 2026, EVYM holds $55.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while CMF manages $5.19 B.
What sectors do the EVYM and CMF ETFs invest in?
EVYM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CMF focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the EVYM ETF and CMF ETF?
EVYM top holdings include Mobile Industrial Development Authority, 4.75% 1dec2054, USD (2024B), New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2059, USD (2025) and FW Texas Street Public Facility Corporation, 5% 1may2038, USD (2025). CMF holds in its top three: Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A), US79766DLC10 and US032556NJ70.
Which ETF is more diversified: EVYM or CMF?
EVYM holds 125 securities with 25.21% of its assets in the top 15. CMF has 1670 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.39%.
Advertisement
Latest news about EVYM & CMF
