Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
EUSAvsIMCBETF Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. EUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, IMCB's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. EUSA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.04% for IMCB. EUSA is up 1.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. IMCB performs better with 2.81% YTD performance, and +$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of EUSA and IMCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
EUSA vs IMCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EUSA IMCB | -3.15%-3.13% | -0.41%+0.98% | +1.13%+2.81% | +14.44%+17.92% | +51.94%+53.12% | +44.90%+45.88% |
| Flows | EUSA IMCB | +$27M+$5M | +$116M+$38M | +$74M+$17M | +$173M+$302M | +$774M+$399M | +$910M+$286M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | EUSA IMCB | +11.84%+12.95% | +17.22%+18.18% | +14.56%+15.32% | +17.01%+17.65% |
| Max drawdown | EUSA IMCB | -3.50%-4.23% | -13.11%-13.82% | -18.22%-19.88% | -25.29%-25.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | EUSA IMCB | 13d13d | 46d46d | 226d238d | 834d835d |
EUSA | IMCB | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.71 | $83.45 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $104.50 | $84.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
EUSA | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
EUSA | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.71 | $83.45 |
| 1D performance | -1.71% | -1.79% |
| AuM | $1.54 B | $1.45 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.04% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the EUSA and IMCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, EUSA is up 1.13% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCB has returned 2.81%. That puts IMCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: EUSA or IMCB?
Year-to-date, the EUSA ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to +$17M for IMCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: EUSA or IMCB?
Over the past year, EUSA had a volatility of 17.22%, while IMCB experienced 18.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: EUSA or IMCB?
As of March 11, 2026, EUSA holds $1.54 B in assets under management (AUM), while IMCB manages $1.45 B.
What sectors do the EUSA and IMCB ETFs invest in?
EUSA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, IMCB focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the EUSA ETF and IMCB ETF?
EUSA top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, US7731211089 and WESTERN DIGITAL. IMCB holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, WESTERN DIGITAL and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: EUSA or IMCB?
EUSA holds 544 securities with 4.09% of its assets in the top 15. IMCB has 403 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.81%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
